Built, verified the signature, checksums, rat and ran some tests.

+1

Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. dec.
3., K, 8:47):

> I actually verified everything (checksums, license checks, tests) last
> week but forgot to vote, sorry about that.
> Also thanks for running the release Bryan.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 8:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey Bryan,
>>
>> Thanks for running the release! +1 binding from my end.
>>
>> Checked signature and checksum, ran license checks, and built against
>> JDK17.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fokko
>>
>> Op di 3 dec 2024 om 08:36 schreef Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl
>> >:
>>
>>> Hey Bryan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for running the release! +1 binding from my end.
>>>
>>> Checked signature and checksum, ran license checks, and built against
>>> JDK17.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Fokko
>>>
>>> Op di 3 dec 2024 om 03:16 schreef Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> The 1.7.1 RC1 release is still up for a vote! The PR merged was to fix
>>>> the release script to correct the KEYS link in the email template, for any
>>>> potential future 1.7.x release.
>>>>
>>>> -Bryan
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 2024, at 5:48 PM, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Is the release blocked? I assume there would be a RC2, right?
>>>> Yufei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 9:02 AM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for adding that PR to the patch release! This should only
>>>>> affect the release script, and only this once :).
>>>>> I see that the documentation site has already been updated.
>>>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#setup
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Kevin Liu
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:36 AM Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Apologies! I see Kevin updated this in the release script and docs
>>>>>> already, in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11526. (The email
>>>>>> template now points to https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a PR to merge this to 1.7.x in case we have another patch
>>>>>> release:
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11629
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Bryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 22, 2024, at 12:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Yufei,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As discussed on the dev mailing list (with Fokko), the KEYS file to
>>>>>> use is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:36 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bryan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This link seems broken,
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS. Should we use
>>>>>> another one, like the one in here
>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 2:36 PM Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>> Iceberg 1.7.1 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The commit ID is 4a432839233f2343a9eae8255532f911f06358ef
>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.1-rc1
>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.1-rc1
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/4a432839233f2343a9eae8255532f911f06358ef
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.1-rc1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1178
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.1
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>>>>> encouraged to cast
>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (NOTE: The vote on 1.7.1 RC0 was skipped as a last minute bug fix
>>>>>> came in.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to