I actually verified everything (checksums, license checks, tests) last week but forgot to vote, sorry about that. Also thanks for running the release Bryan.
+1 (binding) On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 8:37 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey Bryan, > > Thanks for running the release! +1 binding from my end. > > Checked signature and checksum, ran license checks, and built against > JDK17. > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op di 3 dec 2024 om 08:36 schreef Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl > >: > >> Hey Bryan, >> >> Thanks for running the release! +1 binding from my end. >> >> Checked signature and checksum, ran license checks, and built against >> JDK17. >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op di 3 dec 2024 om 03:16 schreef Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com>: >> >>> The 1.7.1 RC1 release is still up for a vote! The PR merged was to fix >>> the release script to correct the KEYS link in the email template, for any >>> potential future 1.7.x release. >>> >>> -Bryan >>> >>> On Dec 2, 2024, at 5:48 PM, Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Is the release blocked? I assume there would be a RC2, right? >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 9:02 AM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for adding that PR to the patch release! This should only affect >>>> the release script, and only this once :). >>>> I see that the documentation site has already been updated. >>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#setup >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:36 AM Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Apologies! I see Kevin updated this in the release script and docs >>>>> already, in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11526. (The email >>>>> template now points to https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS.) >>>>> >>>>> Here's a PR to merge this to 1.7.x in case we have another patch >>>>> release: >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11629 >>>>> >>>>> -Bryan >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 22, 2024, at 12:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Yufei, >>>>> >>>>> As discussed on the dev mailing list (with Fokko), the KEYS file to >>>>> use is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:36 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bryan, >>>>> >>>>> This link seems broken, >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS. Should we use >>>>> another one, like the one in here >>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS? >>>>> >>>>> Yufei >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 2:36 PM Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>> Iceberg 1.7.1 release. >>>>> >>>>> The commit ID is 4a432839233f2343a9eae8255532f911f06358ef >>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.1-rc1 >>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.1-rc1 >>>>> * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/4a432839233f2343a9eae8255532f911f06358ef >>>>> >>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>> * >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.1-rc1 >>>>> >>>>> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> >>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository >>>>> URL is: >>>>> * >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1178 >>>>> >>>>> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.1 >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>> >>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>>> encouraged to cast >>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes >>>>> and more binding >>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>> >>>>> (NOTE: The vote on 1.7.1 RC0 was skipped as a last minute bug fix came >>>>> in.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>
