+1 (binding)

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:37 AM Piotr Findeisen <piotr.findei...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> it looks it's part of the spec that's not connected to the other parts of
> the spec (like "dead code")
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 08:30, Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:29 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> - Ajantha
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:50 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Following the latest community guidelines, I would like to start a
>>>> voting thread on removing the JSON spec for content file and file scan
>>>> task. Here is the PR for the spec change [1]
>>>> >
>>>> > This was previously discussed in the dev mailing list [2]. While it
>>>> is good to add the JSON serializer in iceberg-core for ContentFile and
>>>> FileScanTask, their JSON formats don't need to be added to the core table
>>>> spec.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Steven
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9771
>>>> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to