it looks it's part of the spec that's not connected to the other parts of the spec (like "dead code")
+1 (non binding) On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 08:30, Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:29 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Ajantha >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:50 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Following the latest community guidelines, I would like to start a >>> voting thread on removing the JSON spec for content file and file scan >>> task. Here is the PR for the spec change [1] >>> > >>> > This was previously discussed in the dev mailing list [2]. While it is >>> good to add the JSON serializer in iceberg-core for ContentFile and >>> FileScanTask, their JSON formats don't need to be added to the core table >>> spec. >>> > >>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Steven >>> > >>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9771 >>> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/2ty27yx4q0zlqd5h71cyyhb5k47yf9bv >>> > >>> >>
