Thank you! We will participate in the community sync.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023, at 02:47, Brian Olsen wrote: > Hey Rust folks, tomorrow is the Iceberg Community Sync > <https://iceberg.apache.org/community/#iceberg-community-events>. We will be > discussing locations of the Iceberg client API locations > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/chw53tl0n9jojv3pvhoxwvbon22ot9n8>. While I > think everyone is okay with Rust being outside of the main repo, a few of us > voiced the consistency concern with go and pyIceberg. I'd like to have a > short discussion about going in one direction or the other for all client > projects. The one clear disadvantage is that changes affecting both the > client and the server will be spread across multiple PRs. This should be rare > enough with the clients that it shouldn't matter but let's discuss more > tomorrow if you all can attend. Thanks! > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:49 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> +1, If the folks working on Rust want it in the main repo I have no issues >> with that but it should be their choice :) >> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:47 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: >>> I don't have a strong opinion here. I'd probably lean toward having it in >>> the main repo to get more eyes on the PRs, but I think it's primarily up to >>> the people contributing to the project. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:30 AM Jan Kaul <jank...@mailbox.org.invalid> >>> wrote: >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> we just had our first sync for the rust iceberg developers and it was >>>> great to talk to everyone. >>>> >>>> The most important point that came up was the location where the rust >>>> development should take place. The two options are either to have a >>>> separate "iceberg-rust" repository or to create a "rust" folder in the >>>> existing apache/iceberg repository. >>>> >>>> The benefits of a separate repository are separate CI, simpler merging >>>> of PRs and a more scalable solution if more languages are added. >>>> >>>> The benefits of a subfolder in the existing repository are more >>>> visibility, easier coordination with the java project and more feedback >>>> from the community. >>>> >>>> The developers currently working on the rust implementation slightly >>>> favor a separate repository but would be okay with using the existing >>>> repository. >>>> >>>> >>>> It would be great if you could share your opinions on the topic. Maybe >>>> this could also be a point for the community sync later today. >>>> >>>> Hope you're all doing well. Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Jan >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ryan Blue >>> Tabular Xuanwo