+1, If the folks working on Rust want it in the main repo I have no issues with that but it should be their choice :)
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:47 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: > I don't have a strong opinion here. I'd probably lean toward having it in > the main repo to get more eyes on the PRs, but I think it's primarily up to > the people contributing to the project. > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:30 AM Jan Kaul <jank...@mailbox.org.invalid> > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> we just had our first sync for the rust iceberg developers and it was >> great to talk to everyone. >> >> The most important point that came up was the location where the rust >> development should take place. The two options are either to have a >> separate "iceberg-rust" repository or to create a "rust" folder in the >> existing apache/iceberg repository. >> >> The benefits of a separate repository are separate CI, simpler merging >> of PRs and a more scalable solution if more languages are added. >> >> The benefits of a subfolder in the existing repository are more >> visibility, easier coordination with the java project and more feedback >> from the community. >> >> The developers currently working on the rust implementation slightly >> favor a separate repository but would be okay with using the existing >> repository. >> >> >> It would be great if you could share your opinions on the topic. Maybe >> this could also be a point for the community sync later today. >> >> Hope you're all doing well. Best wishes, >> >> Jan >> >> > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular >
