Hi Daniel, On 2016-12-11 10:33:52, Daniel Sun wrote: > The SimpleHTTPServer will be implemented with NO 3rd part library, so > it will not impact existing production systems. In addition, it is > recommended to be used to provide http service for convenience(such as > testing WebRTC app). If we want to deploy our static web site, the > SimpleHTTPServer is not recommended to be used in production :)
I understand this is not for Production use. ;) My concern is that an HTTP server built into groovy would come with its potential risks – even it is not used directly. Having to redeploy an app where groovy is embedded because of an issue with such a non-critical feature would be somewhat... frustrating. As a groovy user, I want to make sure the pros and cons are carefully considered before adding this to core. My personal preference would be to have this feature as part of an optional groovy library, but maybe it's just me. :D Regards, Sébastien.
