Is it just me or Remi is advising to use a com.sun class?

Le 11 déc. 2016 17:18, "Daniel Sun" <realblue...@hotmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Paul,
>
>       The built-in httpserver of JDK suggested by Remi seems better for us,
> it is stable and does not require 3rd party library:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/tip/src/
> jdk.httpserver/share/classes/com/sun/net/httpserver/package-info.java
>
>       As to hooking to the existing socket server, I think it feasible as
> mrhaki showed the relevant sample code, but we have to maintain it... so I
> would like to implement SimpleHTTPServer based on the built-in httpserver.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-
> SimpleHTTPServer-tp5737191p5737211.html
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to