I don't know whether you would find listing 12.16 from ReGinA useful: It is based on Jetty rather than com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpServer but might provide some useful inspiration:
https://github.com/Dierk/GroovyInAction/blob/master/listings/chap12/Listing_12_16_GroovletExample.groovy Also, I don't know whether you need a separate -m switch or whether you could hook into the existing "listen on port (-l port)" functionality but modify it to accept a class name. Cheers, Paul. On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sébastien, > > The SimpleHTTPServer will be implemented with NO 3rd part library, so > it will not impact existing production systems. In addition, it is > recommended to be used to provide http service for convenience(such as > testing WebRTC app). If we want to deploy our static web site, the > SimpleHTTPServer is not recommended to be used in production :) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-SimpleHTTPServer-tp5737191p5737205.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
