I should have mentioned the above example is more about illustrating groovlets rather than serving up static content but it isn't too hard to switch between the two.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > I don't know whether you would find listing 12.16 from ReGinA useful: > > It is based on Jetty rather than com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpServer but > might provide some useful inspiration: > > https://github.com/Dierk/GroovyInAction/blob/master/listings/chap12/Listing_12_16_GroovletExample.groovy > > Also, I don't know whether you need a separate -m switch or whether > you could hook into the existing "listen on port (-l port)" > functionality but modify it to accept a class name. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Sébastien, >> >> The SimpleHTTPServer will be implemented with NO 3rd part library, so >> it will not impact existing production systems. In addition, it is >> recommended to be used to provide http service for convenience(such as >> testing WebRTC app). If we want to deploy our static web site, the >> SimpleHTTPServer is not recommended to be used in production :) >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-SimpleHTTPServer-tp5737191p5737205.html >> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
