+1 (binding) On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 1:06 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Timo > > > On 28.01.25 11:56, Fabian Hüske wrote: > > +1 (binding) for this FLIP. > > > > Thank you, > > Fabian > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 2:36 AM Natea Eshetu Beshada > > <nbesh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Alan Sheinberg > >> <asheinb...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-498 [1]. It proposes exposing > >>> AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined function. The type already > >>> exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as other UDFs. This FLIP > would > >>> bring it up to parity with others. It has been discussed in this thread > >>> [2]. > >>> > >>> I would like to start a vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 > >> hours > >>> unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-498%3A+AsyncTableFunction+for+async+table+function+support > >>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368 > >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368> > >>> > >> > > > >
