+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Timo
On 28.01.25 11:56, Fabian Hüske wrote:
+1 (binding) for this FLIP.
Thank you,
Fabian
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 2:36 AM Natea Eshetu Beshada
<nbesh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Alan Sheinberg
<asheinb...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-498 [1]. It proposes exposing
AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined function. The type already
exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as other UDFs. This FLIP would
bring it up to parity with others. It has been discussed in this thread
[2].
I would like to start a vote. The vote will be open for at least 72
hours
unless there is an objection or insufficient votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-498%3A+AsyncTableFunction+for+async+table+function+support
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368>
