+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Alan Sheinberg <asheinb...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-498 [1]. It proposes exposing > AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined function. The type already > exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as other UDFs. This FLIP would > bring it up to parity with others. It has been discussed in this thread > [2]. > > I would like to start a vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-498%3A+AsyncTableFunction+for+async+table+function+support > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368 > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368> >
