+1 (binding) for this FLIP. Thank you, Fabian
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 2:36 AM Natea Eshetu Beshada <nbesh...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM Alan Sheinberg > <asheinb...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-498 [1]. It proposes exposing > > AsyncTableFunction as a proper user defined function. The type already > > exists for Lookup Joins, but isn't usable as other UDFs. This FLIP would > > bring it up to parity with others. It has been discussed in this thread > > [2]. > > > > I would like to start a vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 > hours > > unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-498%3A+AsyncTableFunction+for+async+table+function+support > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368 > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/kgbpj96b4lw1c39gq5p0j0t8b1ssm368> > > >
