Hi Xintong, yes, such labels would make a lot of sense. I added a sentence to the document.
Thanks, Konstantin On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:51 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for driving this discussion, Konstantin. > > I like the idea of having a bot reminding reporter/assignee/watchers about > inactive tickets and if needed downgrade/close them automatically. > > My two cents: > We may have labels like "downgraded-by-bot" / "closed-by-bot", so that it's > easier to filter and review tickets updated by the bot. > We may want to review such tickets (e.g., monthly) in case a valid ticket > failed to draw the attention of relevant committers and the reporter > doesn't know who to ping. > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 1:37 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thanks for starting this discussion Konstantin. I like your proposal and > > also the idea of automating the tedious parts of it via a bot. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 4:17 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Flink Community, > > > > > > I would like to start a discussion on improving and to some extent > simply > > > defining the way we work with Jira. Some aspects have been discussed a > > > while back [1], but I would like to go a bit beyond that with the > > following > > > goals in mind: > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > clearer communication and expectation management with the community > > > - > > > > > > a user or contributor should be able to judge the urgency of a > > ticket > > > by its priority > > > - > > > > > > if a ticket is assigned to someone the expectation that someone > is > > > working on it should hold > > > - > > > > > > generally reduce noise in Jira > > > - > > > > > > reduce overhead of committers to ask about status updates of > > > contributions or bug reports > > > - > > > > > > “Are you still working on this?” > > > - > > > > > > “Are you still interested in this?” > > > - > > > > > > “Does this still happen on Flink 1.x?” > > > - > > > > > > “Are you still experiencing this issue?” > > > - > > > > > > “What is the status of the implementation”? > > > - > > > > > > while still encouraging users to add new tickets and to leave > feedback > > > about existing tickets > > > > > > > > > Please see the full proposal here: > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19VmykDSn4BHgsCNTXtN89R7xea8e3cUIl-uivW8L6W8/edit# > > > . > > > > > > The idea would be to discuss this proposal in this thread. If we come > to > > a > > > conclusion, I'd document the proposal in the wiki [2] and we would then > > > vote on it (approval by "Lazy Majority"). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Konstantin > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd34fb695d371c2bf0cbd1696ce190bac35dd78f29edd8c60d0c7ee71%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLINK+Jira+field+definitions > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Konstantin Knauf > > > > > > https://twitter.com/snntrable > > > > > > https://github.com/knaufk > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk
