Thanks for starting this discussion Konstantin. I like your proposal and
also the idea of automating the tedious parts of it via a bot.

Cheers,
Till

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 4:17 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> wrote:

> Dear Flink Community,
>
> I would like to start a discussion on improving and to some extent simply
> defining the way we work with Jira. Some aspects have been discussed a
> while back [1], but I would like to go a bit beyond that with the following
> goals in mind:
>
>
>    -
>
>    clearer communication and expectation management with the community
>    -
>
>       a user or contributor should be able to judge the urgency of a ticket
>       by its priority
>       -
>
>       if a ticket is assigned to someone the expectation that someone is
>       working on it should hold
>       -
>
>    generally reduce noise in Jira
>    -
>
>    reduce overhead of committers to ask about status updates of
>    contributions or bug reports
>    -
>
>       “Are you still working on this?”
>       -
>
>       “Are you still interested in this?”
>       -
>
>       “Does this still happen on Flink 1.x?”
>       -
>
>       “Are you still experiencing this issue?”
>       -
>
>       “What is the status of the implementation”?
>       -
>
>    while still encouraging users to add new tickets and to leave feedback
>    about existing tickets
>
>
> Please see the full proposal here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19VmykDSn4BHgsCNTXtN89R7xea8e3cUIl-uivW8L6W8/edit#
> .
>
> The idea would be to discuss this proposal in this thread. If we come to a
> conclusion, I'd document the proposal in the wiki [2] and we would then
> vote on it (approval by "Lazy Majority").
>
> Cheers,
>
> Konstantin
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd34fb695d371c2bf0cbd1696ce190bac35dd78f29edd8c60d0c7ee71%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> [2]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLINK+Jira+field+definitions
>
> --
>
> Konstantin Knauf
>
> https://twitter.com/snntrable
>
> https://github.com/knaufk
>

Reply via email to