+1 (binding)

- Verified signatures and checksums
- Source archive does not contain any new binaries
- Successfully built Flink from sources for Hadoop 2.7.5 and Scala 2.12
- Verified that no new dependencies have been added
- Verified that the last release-1.9 cron job passed. The cron job being
executed on the 03.10. had one failing profile where no output was
generated during maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process. I think this is
not a problem.
- Started a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example
- Verified that logs and out file don't contain suspicious output
modulo FLINK-14385

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> - Start the cluster locally and ran some examples successfully
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to 1.8.3
> > and 1.9.2.
> >
> > Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the
> > verification.
> > I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week.
> > The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes or
> any
> > blocker issue is found.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jark
> >
> > > 在 2019年10月14日,02:11,Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 写道:
> > >
> > > I think FLINK-14385<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385>
> > is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release
> > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Yun Tang
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> > > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Do the following checks and all are success.
> > > - Verified signatures and hashes.
> > > - Built from the source archive.
> > > - Check repository contains all artifacts.
> > > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
> > >    a. Both streaming and batch
> > >    b. Web UI works fine
> > > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
> > >    a. Both streaming and batch
> > >    b. Web UI works fine
> > >    c. Read write hdfs files.
> > >    d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
> > >
> > > Minor comments(not blocker)
> > > - One comment about the website pr.
> > > - Found an issue that there are
> > > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
> > > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users
> and
> > > would be nice if can be improved. (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
> > >
> > > Best, Hequn
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Jingsong,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these
> > issues.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Jark
> > >>
> > >>> 在 2019年10月12日,16:45,Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> > >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> > >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache
> > >> headers
> > >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> > >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down.
> > verified
> > >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> > >>> All succeeded.
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do
> you
> > >> need
> > >>> modify fix version?
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Jingsong Lee
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 from my side.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - checked signatures and hashes
> > >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> > >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11
> successfully
> > >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to
> > check
> > >>>> dependencies, looks good
> > >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples,
> verified
> > >> web
> > >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Jark
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <
> sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker
> issues.
> > >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix
> of
> > >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Jincheng
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've
> > marked
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new
> RC,
> > >> then
> > >>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update
> the
> > >> fix
> > >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <
> trohrm...@apache.org
> > >
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would
> > >> also
> > >>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
> > >>>>>>> ticket, I
> > >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National
> Day
> > >>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> > >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I
> guess
> > we
> > >>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> > >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do
> > you
> > >>>>>>> think
> > >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4
> days
> > >>>> ago?
> > >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> > >>>>>>>>> <wander4...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but
> given
> > >>>>>>> 1.9.1
> > >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're
> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>> tison.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> > >> version
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > >>>>>>> comments)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > >>>>>>> includes:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > >>>>>>> releases to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> key
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> Repository
> > >>>> [4],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > >>>>>>> announcement
> > >>>>>>>>>>> blog
> > >>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > >>>> affirmative
> > >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to