Thanks everyone for checking the release and voting! I’ll summary the voting result in a separate email.
Cheers, Jark On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:41, jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1(binding) > - Verified signatures and checksums. > - Verified a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example > without suspicious output. > - Verified all POM files point to the right version. > > Best, > Jincheng > > Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年10月17日周四 下午11:45写道： > > > +1 (binding) > > > > - Verified signatures and checksums > > - Source archive does not contain any new binaries > > - Successfully built Flink from sources for Hadoop 2.7.5 and Scala 2.12 > > - Verified that no new dependencies have been added > > - Verified that the last release-1.9 cron job passed. The cron job being > > executed on the 03.10. had one failing profile where no output was > > generated during maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process. I think this > is > > not a problem. > > - Started a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example > > - Verified that logs and out file don't contain suspicious output > > modulo FLINK-14385 > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries > > > - Start the cluster locally and ran some examples successfully > > > > > > Best, > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to > > 1.8.3 > > > > and 1.9.2. > > > > > > > > Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the > > > > verification. > > > > I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week. > > > > The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes > or > > > any > > > > blocker issue is found. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jark > > > > > > > > > 在 2019年10月14日，02:11，Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 写道： > > > > > > > > > > I think FLINK-14385< > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385> > > > > is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to > release > > > > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266 > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > Yun Tang > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28 > > > > > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1 > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Do the following checks and all are success. > > > > > - Verified signatures and hashes. > > > > > - Built from the source archive. > > > > > - Check repository contains all artifacts. > > > > > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster. > > > > > a. Both streaming and batch > > > > > b. Web UI works fine > > > > > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes. > > > > > a. Both streaming and batch > > > > > b. Web UI works fine > > > > > c. Read write hdfs files. > > > > > d. Test session mode and non-session mode. > > > > > > > > > > Minor comments(not blocker) > > > > > - One comment about the website pr. > > > > > - Found an issue that there are > > > > > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup > > > > > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new > users > > > and > > > > > would be nice if can be improved. ( > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385) > > > > > > > > > > Best, Hequn > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Jingsong, > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these > > > > issues. > > > > >> > > > > >> Best, > > > > >> Jark > > > > >> > > > > >>> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > >>> > > > > >>> +1 (non-binding) > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files > > > > >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files > > > > >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries > > > > >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have > > Apache > > > > >> headers > > > > >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1) > > > > >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. > > > > verified > > > > >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples. > > > > >>> All succeeded. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, > do > > > you > > > > >> need > > > > >>> modify fix version? > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328 > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327 > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215 > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072 > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Best, > > > > >>> Jingsong Lee > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> +1 from my side. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> - checked signatures and hashes > > > > >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version > > > > >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries > > > > >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 > > > successfully > > > > >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 > to > > > > check > > > > >>>> dependencies, looks good > > > > >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, > > > verified > > > > >> web > > > > >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Best, > > > > >>>> Jark > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>> Jark > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun < > > > sunjincheng...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker > > > issues. > > > > >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the > > fix > > > of > > > > >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>>> Jincheng > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道： > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've > > > > marked > > > > >>>> the > > > > >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a > new > > > RC, > > > > >> then > > > > >>>>>>> we > > > > >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to > update > > > the > > > > >> fix > > > > >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > >>>>>>> Till > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I > > would > > > > >> also > > > > >>>>>>> be > > > > >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close > > the > > > > >>>>>>> ticket, I > > > > >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > >>>>>>>> Till > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese > National > > > Day > > > > >>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe, > > > > >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I > > > guess > > > > we > > > > >>>>>>> have > > > > >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward. > > > > >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. > What > > do > > > > you > > > > >>>>>>> think > > > > >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng? > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 > > > days > > > > >>>> ago? > > > > >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen > > > > >>>>>>>>> <wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>>>>>> Jark > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen < > wander4...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but > > > given > > > > >>>>>>> 1.9.1 > > > > >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that > we're > > > sure > > > > >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315 > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道： > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for > the > > > > >> version > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> as follows: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide > specific > > > > >>>>>>> comments) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, > > which > > > > >>>>>>> includes: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary > convenience > > > > >>>>>>> releases to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with > the > > > key > > > > >>>> with > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3], > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central > > > Repository > > > > >>>> [4], > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5], > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding > > > > >>>>>>> announcement > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> blog > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> post [6]. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC > > > > >>>> affirmative > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/ > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [3] > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/ > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [5] > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -- > > > > >>> Best, Jingsong Lee > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
