Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to 1.8.3 and 1.9.2.
Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the verification. I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week. The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes or any blocker issue is found. Thanks, Jark > 在 2019年10月14日,02:11,Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 写道: > > I think FLINK-14385<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385> is not > introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release hadoop-free > Flink form 1.8 [1] > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266 > > Best > Yun Tang > ________________________________ > From: Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28 > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1 > > +1 (non-binding) > > Do the following checks and all are success. > - Verified signatures and hashes. > - Built from the source archive. > - Check repository contains all artifacts. > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster. > a. Both streaming and batch > b. Web UI works fine > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes. > a. Both streaming and batch > b. Web UI works fine > c. Read write hdfs files. > d. Test session mode and non-session mode. > > Minor comments(not blocker) > - One comment about the website pr. > - Found an issue that there are > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users and > would be nice if can be improved. ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385) > > Best, Hequn > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jingsong, >> >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these issues. >> >> Best, >> Jark >> >>> 在 2019年10月12日,16:45,Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 写道: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache >> headers >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1) >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. verified >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples. >>> All succeeded. >>> >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you >> need >>> modify fix version? >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576 >>> >>> Best, >>> Jingsong Lee >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 from my side. >>>> >>>> - checked signatures and hashes >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check >>>> dependencies, looks good >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified >> web >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Jark >>>> >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Jark >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues. >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Jincheng >>>>>> >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked >>>> the >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, >> then >>>>>>> we >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the >> fix >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Till >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would >> also >>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the >>>>>>> ticket, I >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day >>>> and >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe, >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we >>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward. >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you >>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days >>>> ago? >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen >>>>>>>>> <wander4...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Jark >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given >>>>>>> 1.9.1 >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> tison. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the >> version >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1, >>>>>>>>>>> as follows: >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >>>>>>> comments) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which >>>>>>> includes: >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience >>>>>>> releases to >>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key >>>> with >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3], >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository >>>> [4], >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5], >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding >>>>>>> announcement >>>>>>>>>>> blog >>>>>>>>>>> post [6]. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC >>>> affirmative >>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Jark >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003 >>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>> [4] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/ >>>>>>>>>>> [5] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252 >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best, Jingsong Lee >> >>