Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 turns out to be an actual blocker, so we would have to close this RC now in favor of a new one.
Since we are already quite past the planned release time for 1.9.0, I would like to limit the new changes included in RC3 to only the following: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 - Fix license and notice file issues that Kurt had found with flink-runtime-web and flink-state-processing-api This means that I will not be creating RC3 with the release-1.9 branch as is, but essentially only cherry-picking the above mentioned changes on top of RC2. The minimal set of changes on top of RC2 should allow us to carry most if not all of the already existing votes without another round of extensive testing, and allow us to have a shortened voting time. I understand that there are other issues mentioned in this thread that are already spotted and merged to release-1.9, especially for the Blink planner and DDL, but I suggest not to include them in RC3. I think it would be better to collect all the remaining issues for those over a period of time, and include them as 1.9.1 which can ideally also happen a few weeks soon after 1.9.0. What do you think? If there are not objections, I would proceed with this plan and push out a new RC by the end of today (Aug. 19th CET). Regards, Gordon On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:09 AM Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > We should investigate the performance regression but regardless the > regression I vote +1 > > Have verified following things > > - Jobs running on YARN x (Session & Per Job) with high-availability > enabled. > - Simulate JM and TM failures. > - Simulate temporary network partition. > > Best, > tison. > > > Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年8月18日周日 下午10:12写道： > > > For reference, this is the JIRA issue about the regression in question: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:57 AM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, till > > > I can send the job to you offline. > > > It is just a datastream job and does not use > > TwoInputSelectableStreamTask. > > > A->B > > > \ > > > C > > > / > > > D->E > > > Best, > > > Guowei > > > > > > > > > Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午4:34写道： > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this issue Guowei. Could you share a bit more > > > details > > > > what the job exactly does and which operators it uses? Does the job > > uses > > > > the new `TwoInputSelectableStreamTask` which might cause the > > performance > > > > regression? > > > > > > > > I think it is important to understand where the problem comes from > > before > > > > we proceed with the release. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Till > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:27 AM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > -1 > > > > > We have a benchmark job, which includes a two-input operator. > > > > > This job has a big performance regression using 1.9 compared to > 1.8. > > > > > It's still not very clear why this regression happens. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Guowei > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午3:27写道： > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > - checked release notes: OK > > > > > > - checked sums and signatures: OK > > > > > > - source release > > > > > > - contains no binaries: OK > > > > > > - contains no 1.9-SNAPSHOT references: OK > > > > > > - build from source: OK (8u102) > > > > > > - mvn clean verify: OK (8u102) > > > > > > - binary release > > > > > > - no examples appear to be missing > > > > > > - started a cluster; WebUI reachable, example ran > successfully > > > > > > - repository appears to contain all expected artifacts > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:06, Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jark, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for letting me know that it's been like this in previous > > > > > releases. > > > > > > > Though I don't think that's the right behavior, it can be > > discussed > > > > for > > > > > > > later release. Thus I retract my -1 for RC2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bowen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Bowen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this. > > > > > > > > However, I don't think this is an issue. IMO, it is by > design. > > > > > > > > The `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API and `show > > > > > > functions;` > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > SQL CLI are intended to return only the registered UDFs, not > > > > > including > > > > > > > > built-in functions. > > > > > > > > This is also the behavior in previous versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Jark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -1 for RC2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found a bug > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13741, > > > > > > and I > > > > > > > > > think it's a blocker. The bug means currently if users > call > > > > > > > > > `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API or `show > > > > functions;` > > > > > > > thru > > > > > > > > > SQL would not be able to see Flink's built-in functions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm preparing a fix right now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bowen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:55 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all the test efforts, verifications and votes > so > > > > far. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far, things are looking good, but we still require one > > > more > > > > > PMC > > > > > > > > > binding > > > > > > > > > > vote for this RC to be the official release, so I would > > like > > > to > > > > > > > extend > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > vote time for 1 more day, until *Aug. 16th 17:00 CET*. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, the release notes for 1.9.0 had only > just > > > been > > > > > > > > finalized > > > > > > > > > > [1], and could use a few more eyes before closing the > vote. > > > > > > > > > > Any help with checking if anything else should be > mentioned > > > > there > > > > > > > > > regarding > > > > > > > > > > breaking changes / known shortcomings would be > appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Gordon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:58 PM Kurt Young < > > ykt...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Great, then I have no other comments on legal check. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:56 PM Chesnay Schepler < > > > > > > > ches...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The licensing items aren't a problem; we don't care > > about > > > > > Flink > > > > > > > > > modules > > > > > > > > > > > > in NOTICE files, and we don't have to update the > > > > > source-release > > > > > > > > > > > > licensing since we don't have a pre-built version of > > the > > > > > WebUI > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > source. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15/08/2019 15:22, Kurt Young wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > After going through the licenses, I found 2 > > suspicions > > > > but > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > valid or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. flink-state-processing-api is packaged in to > > > > flink-dist > > > > > > jar, > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > included in > > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTICE-binary file (the one under the root > directory) > > > > like > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > > > modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. flink-runtime-web distributed some JavaScript > > > > > dependencies > > > > > > > > > through > > > > > > > > > > > > source > > > > > > > > > > > > > codes, the licenses and NOTICE file were only > updated > > > > > inside > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > module > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > flink-runtime-web, but not the NOTICE file and > > licenses > > > > > > > directory > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > > > > > > the root directory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another minor issue I just found is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > FLINK-13558 tries to include table examples to > > > > flink-dist, > > > > > > but > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > > > > > > > find it in > > > > > > > > > > > > > the binary distribution of RC2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:19 PM Kurt Young < > > > > > ykt...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Gordon & Timo, > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for the feedback, and I agree with it. I > will > > > > > > document > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >> release notes. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:14 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) > Tai > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> With the same argument as before, given that it > is > > > > > > mentioned > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> announcement that it is a preview feature, I > would > > > not > > > > > > block > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> because of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Nevertheless, it would be important to mention > this > > > > > > > explicitly > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> release notes [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Gordon > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:29 AM Timo Walther < > > > > > > > > > twal...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> I agree that this is a serious bug. However, I > > would > > > > not > > > > > > > block > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> release because of this. As you said, there is a > > > > > > workaround > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> `execute()` works in the most common case of a > > > single > > > > > > > > execution. > > > > > > > > > > We > > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> fix this in a minor release shortly after. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> What do others think? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Timo > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Am 15.08.19 um 11:23 schrieb Kurt Young: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> HI, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> We just find a serious bug around blink > planner: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> When user reused the table environment > instance, > > > and > > > > > call > > > > > > > > > > `execute` > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> method > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> multiple times for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> different sql, the later call will trigger the > > > > earlier > > > > > > ones > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> re-executed. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> It's a serious bug but seems we also have a > work > > > > > around, > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> never > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> reuse the table environment > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> object. I'm not sure if we should treat this > one > > as > > > > > > blocker > > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> 1.9.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> What's your opinion? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gary Yao < > > > > > > > g...@ververica.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jepsen test suite passed 10 times > consecutively > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha > > Krettek < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> aljos...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I did some testing on a Google Cloud Dataproc > > > > cluster > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > gives > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage (GCS)): > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - tried both YARN session mode and YARN > > > per-job > > > > > > mode, > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > using > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a YARN > > session > > > > > > cluster > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - ran examples that write to GCS, both > with > > > the > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > > Hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> FileSystem > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and a custom “plugin” FileSystem > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - ran stateful streaming jobs that use > GCS > > > as a > > > > > > > > > checkpoint > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> backend > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - tried running SQL programs on YARN > using > > > the > > > > > SQL > > > > > > > Cli: > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> worked > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> YARN session mode but not for YARN per-job > > mode. > > > > > > Looking > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> code I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> don’t think per-job mode would work from > seeing > > > how > > > > > it > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> implemented. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> But > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I think it’s an OK restriction to have for > now > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - in all the testing I had fine-grained > > > > recovery > > > > > > > > (region > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> failover) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> enabled but I didn’t simulate any failures > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young < > > > > > > ykt...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for preparing this release > candidate. I > > > > have > > > > > > > > verified > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> following: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - verified the checksums and GPG files match > > the > > > > > > > > > corresponding > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> files > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - verified that the source archives do not > > > > contains > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > binaries > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.11 > > > > > > successfully. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 issuses > > > > > > [FLINK-13687] > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> [FLINK-13688], > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> both are not release blockers. Other than > > that, > > > > all > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> passed. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - ran all e2e tests which don't need > download > > > > > external > > > > > > > > > > packages > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> (it's > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> very > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> unstable > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in China and almost impossible to download > > > them), > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > passed. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> - started local cluster, ran some examples. > > Met > > > a > > > > > > small > > > > > > > > > > website > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> display > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> issue > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [FLINK-13591], which is also not a release > > > > blocker. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Although we have pushed some fixes around > > blink > > > > > > planner > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > hive > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> integration > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> after RC2, but consider these are both > preview > > > > > > features, > > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > > > lean > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> ok > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> to release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> without these fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> +1 from my side. (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark Wu < > > > > > > > imj...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I have verified the following things: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 > > and > > > > > Scala > > > > > > > 2.11 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> successfully > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - checked/verified signatures and hashes > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - checked that all POM files point to the > > same > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - ran some flink table related end-to-end > > tests > > > > > > locally > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> succeeded > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is reported > in > > > > > > > > FLINK-13704) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and > > 2.12, > > > > ran > > > > > > > > > examples, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> verified > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> web > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to > > temporal > > > > join > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > kafka > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> source > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> mysql jdbc table, and write results to > kafka > > > > again. > > > > > > > Using > > > > > > > > > DDL > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> create > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> source and sinks. looks good. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - reviewed the release PR > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as blocker > > > > issue, > > > > > so > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> side > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (non-binding). > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till > Rohrmann < > > > > > > > > > > > > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Richard, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> although I can see that it would be handy > > for > > > > > users > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> PubSub > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> set > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> up, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I would rather not include examples which > > > > require > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > external > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> dependency > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> into the Flink distribution. I think > > examples > > > > > should > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> self-contained. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> My > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> concern is that we would bloat the > > > distribution > > > > > for > > > > > > > many > > > > > > > > > > users > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think it > would > > be > > > > > > better > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> these > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> examples available differently, maybe > > through > > > > > > Flink's > > > > > > > > > > > ecosystem > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> website > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> or > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> maybe a new examples section in Flink's > > > > > > documentation. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark Wu < > > > > > > > > imj...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> After thinking about we can use VARCHAR > as > > an > > > > > > > > alternative > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/time/date. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a > blocker > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, Richard > > > > > Deurwaarder < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> rich...@xeli.eu > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar is not > > > > included > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> examples/ > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> dir > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> flink-dist. I've created > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> + > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will leave it up to you to decide if > we > > > want > > > > > to > > > > > > > add > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> 1.9.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM Till > > > Rohrmann > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. Could > > this > > > > be > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > documented > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> limitation > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think we > have > > > > agreed > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Blink > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> SQL > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> planner > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> will be rather a preview feature than > > > > > production > > > > > > > > ready. > > > > > > > > > > > Hence > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> it > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> could > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> still contain some bugs. My concern is > > that > > > > > there > > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> still > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> other > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit by bit > > and > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > postpone > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> even > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are > > blockers. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM Jark > Wu < > > > > > > > > > > imj...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just find an issue when testing > > > connector > > > > > DDLs > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> blink > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> planner > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rc2. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL doesn't > work > > > when > > > > > > > > > containing > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> type. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] > > > and a > > > > > > pull > > > > > > > > > > request > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue of > 1.9 > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > Because > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are primitive > types, > > > and > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > break > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> DDL > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I want to hear more thoughts > > from > > > > the > > > > > > > > > community > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> whether > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket > > Qin < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM > Tzu-Li > > > > > (Gordon) > > > > > > > > Tai < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is a @PublicEvolving > > > interface, > > > > > > > > > technically > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ok > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> break > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it across releases (including across > > > > bugfix > > > > > > > > > > releases?). > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it now, > > > please > > > > > > mark > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> as > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in the > > case a > > > > new > > > > > > RC > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > created, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> usually > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check the list of changes compared > to > > > the > > > > > > > previous > > > > > > > > > RC, > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> correct > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fix > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding JIRAs > to > > > be > > > > > the > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (in > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 > instead > > > of > > > > > > > 1.9.1). > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till > > > > > Rohrmann > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be nicer. Not > > > sure > > > > > > > whether > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> cancel > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it is > open > > > for > > > > > > quite > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed until very recently. > Maybe > > we > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > include > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> on > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortlist > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we do in > > > case > > > > > that > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > RC > > > > > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM > > Becket > > > > Qin > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already > > > documented > > > > in > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > So > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> technically > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to change it > > > later. > > > > It > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > > > better > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> if > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> we > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM > Till > > > > > > Rohrmann > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the PubSub > > > connector > > > > is > > > > > > > > public > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> evolving > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> instead? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM > > > Becket > > > > > Qin > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a > > minor > > > > > > Google > > > > > > > > > PubSub > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> connector > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> API > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config rate > > > limiting. > > > > > The > > > > > > > GCP > > > > > > > > > > > PubSub > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> connector > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newly > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in 1.9, so > it > > > > would > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > nice > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> include > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later to > > avoid > > > a > > > > > > public > > > > > > > > API > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> change. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> am > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking of > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker for > 1.9. > > > Want > > > > > to > > > > > > > > check > > > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> others > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM > > Zili > > > > > Chen > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your explanation. > For > > > [1] > > > > I > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > least > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> we > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, like > unset > > > the > > > > > > fixed > > > > > > > > > > version. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> For > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test scope > > but > > > > > > wonder > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> commit > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. IIRC > > > previous > > > > RC > > > > > > > VOTE > > > > > > > > > > > threads > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I will > try > > to > > > > > look > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > it, > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 下午5:42写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. The 2 > > > > issues > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > mentioned > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> were > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the second > > > issue > > > > > > and a > > > > > > > > PR > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> opened > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing > > problem, > > > > > should > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> blocker > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it into > 1.9 > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 > PM > > > Zili > > > > > > Chen > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a few > hours > > > ago > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> two > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> new > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as blockers > to > > > > > > > > 1.9.0[1][2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as > > duplication > > > > but > > > > > > > still > > > > > > > > > > marked > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> as > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] > > is > > > > > > > downgrade > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> "Major" > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priority > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be fixed > in > > > > > 1.9.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to have > > > attention > > > > > of > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> manager > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra < > > gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:10写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy enough, will > > > try! > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > 11:00 > > AM > > > > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > Ewen > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply build > > > Flink > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your > > > CloudEra > > > > > > libs? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the recommended way > > > these > > > > > > days. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > 10:48 > > > AM > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > > > Fóra < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I also > > figured > > > > out > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> need > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> project > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set to > the > > > > > specific > > > > > > > > > hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > 9:54 > > > AM > > > > > > Dawid > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Wysakowicz > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dwysakow...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues with > mapr > > > > maven > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> repository, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the > > > > "unsafe-mapr-repo" > > > > > > > > profile. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 19:31, > Gyula > > > Fóra > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the RC > > > locally > > > > > with > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I do I > run > > > into > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> dependency > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have > worked > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > past. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be some > > > > > documentation > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> somewhere > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any pointers > :) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at > > 6:57 > > > > PM > > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Fóra > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to build > > > > 1.9.0-rc2 > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following > error: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install > > > -DskipTests > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop > (ignore > > > that > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to > execute > > > > goal > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> project > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve dependencies > for > > > > > project > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact descriptor for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ): > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PKIX > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid certification > path > > to > > > > > > > requested > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> target > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a TLS > > > error. > > > > > > Might > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> related > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to know. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at > > 6:26 > > > > PM > > > > > > > Tzu-Li > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that the > > > > > unresolved > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> issues > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", as > seen > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > JIRA > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notes > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents for > new > > > > > > features. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them still > > > > > associated > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> since > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for 1.9.0 soon > > > along > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> official > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at > > > 6:17 > > > > PM > > > > > > > > Tzu-Li > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidate #2 > > for > > > > > Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the first > > voting > > > > > > > candidate > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 and > RC1. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and > vote > > on > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #2 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not > approve > > > the > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (please > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging > > area > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> available > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes > > [1], > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache > > > > source > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to > > > > dist.apache.org > > > > > > [2], > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> which > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be > > > > > deployed > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Central > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> “release-1.9.0-rc2” > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [5]. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also > > preparing > > > a > > > > > pull > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> request > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and will > > > update > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> voting > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly > > > afterwards. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open > > for > > > > *at > > > > > > > least > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 72 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hours*. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your > votes > > > > before > > > > > > > *Aug. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 14th > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Wed.) > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2019, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by majority > > > > approval, > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> at > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> least > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
