Looking at FLINK-13699, it seems to be very local to Table API and HBase connector. We can cherry-pick that without re-running distributed tests.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:46 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > I've merged the fix for FLINK-13752. Hence we are good to go to create the > new RC. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:30 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I support Jark's fix for FLINK-13699 because it would be disappointing > > if both DDL and connectors are ready to handle DATE/TIME/TIMESTAMP but a > > little component in the middle of the stack is preventing an otherwise > > usable feature. The changes are minor. > > > > Thanks, > > Timo > > > > > > Am 19.08.19 um 13:24 schrieb Jark Wu: > > > Hi Gordon, > > > > > > I agree that we should pick the minimal set of changes to shorten the > > > release testing time. > > > However, I would like to include FLINK-13699 into RC3. FLINK-13699 is a > > > critical DDL issue, and is a small change to flink table (won't affect > > the > > > runtime feature and stability). > > > I will do some tests around sql and blink planner if the RC3 include > this > > > fix. > > > > > > But if the community against to include it, I'm also fine with having > it > > in > > > the next minor release. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jark > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 16:16, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 for Gordon's approach. > > >> > > >> If we do that, we can probably skip re-testing everything and mainly > > need > > >> to verify the release artifacts (signatures, build from source, etc.). > > >> > > >> If we open the RC up for changes, I fear a lot of small issues will > > rush in > > >> and destabilize the candidate again, meaning we have to do another > > larger > > >> testing effort. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:48 AM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Gordon, > > >>> > > >>> I remember we mentioned earlier that if there is an additional RC, we > > can > > >>> piggyback the GCP PubSub API change ( > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13231). It is a small > > patch > > >> to > > >>> avoid future API change. So should be able to merge it very shortly. > > >> Would > > >>> it be possible to include that into RC3 as well? > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> > > >>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:43 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > tzuli...@apache.org > > >>> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 turns out to be > an > > >>>> actual > > >>>> blocker, so we would have to close this RC now in favor of a new > one. > > >>>> > > >>>> Since we are already quite past the planned release time for 1.9.0, > I > > >>> would > > >>>> like to limit the new changes included in RC3 to only the following: > > >>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 > > >>>> - Fix license and notice file issues that Kurt had found with > > >>>> flink-runtime-web and flink-state-processing-api > > >>>> > > >>>> This means that I will not be creating RC3 with the release-1.9 > branch > > >> as > > >>>> is, but essentially only cherry-picking the above mentioned changes > on > > >>> top > > >>>> of RC2. > > >>>> The minimal set of changes on top of RC2 should allow us to carry > most > > >> if > > >>>> not all of the already existing votes without another round of > > >> extensive > > >>>> testing, and allow us to have a shortened voting time. > > >>>> > > >>>> I understand that there are other issues mentioned in this thread > that > > >>> are > > >>>> already spotted and merged to release-1.9, especially for the Blink > > >>> planner > > >>>> and DDL, but I suggest not to include them in RC3. > > >>>> I think it would be better to collect all the remaining issues for > > >> those > > >>>> over a period of time, and include them as 1.9.1 which can ideally > > also > > >>>> happen a few weeks soon after 1.9.0. > > >>>> > > >>>> What do you think? If there are not objections, I would proceed with > > >> this > > >>>> plan and push out a new RC by the end of today (Aug. 19th CET). > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> Gordon > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:09 AM Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>> We should investigate the performance regression but regardless the > > >>>>> regression I vote +1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Have verified following things > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - Jobs running on YARN x (Session & Per Job) with high-availability > > >>>>> enabled. > > >>>>> - Simulate JM and TM failures. > > >>>>> - Simulate temporary network partition. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best, > > >>>>> tison. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年8月18日周日 下午10:12写道： > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> For reference, this is the JIRA issue about the regression in > > >>> question: > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:57 AM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> Hi, till > > >>>>>>> I can send the job to you offline. > > >>>>>>> It is just a datastream job and does not use > > >>>>>> TwoInputSelectableStreamTask. > > >>>>>>> A->B > > >>>>>>> \ > > >>>>>>> C > > >>>>>>> / > > >>>>>>> D->E > > >>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>> Guowei > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午4:34写道： > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this issue Guowei. Could you share a bit > > >>> more > > >>>>>>> details > > >>>>>>>> what the job exactly does and which operators it uses? Does the > > >>> job > > >>>>>> uses > > >>>>>>>> the new `TwoInputSelectableStreamTask` which might cause the > > >>>>>> performance > > >>>>>>>> regression? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I think it is important to understand where the problem comes > > >>> from > > >>>>>> before > > >>>>>>>> we proceed with the release. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:27 AM Guowei Ma < > > >> guowei....@gmail.com > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>> -1 > > >>>>>>>>> We have a benchmark job, which includes a two-input operator. > > >>>>>>>>> This job has a big performance regression using 1.9 compared > > >> to > > >>>>> 1.8. > > >>>>>>>>> It's still not very clear why this regression happens. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>> Guowei > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午3:27写道： > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> - checked release notes: OK > > >>>>>>>>>> - checked sums and signatures: OK > > >>>>>>>>>> - source release > > >>>>>>>>>> - contains no binaries: OK > > >>>>>>>>>> - contains no 1.9-SNAPSHOT references: OK > > >>>>>>>>>> - build from source: OK (8u102) > > >>>>>>>>>> - mvn clean verify: OK (8u102) > > >>>>>>>>>> - binary release > > >>>>>>>>>> - no examples appear to be missing > > >>>>>>>>>> - started a cluster; WebUI reachable, example ran > > >>>>> successfully > > >>>>>>>>>> - repository appears to contain all expected artifacts > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>> Yu > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:06, Bowen Li < > > >> bowenl...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for letting me know that it's been like this in > > >>>> previous > > >>>>>>>>> releases. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Though I don't think that's the right behavior, it can be > > >>>>>> discussed > > >>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>> later release. Thus I retract my -1 for RC2. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Bowen > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jark Wu < > > >> imj...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bowen, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> However, I don't think this is an issue. IMO, it is by > > >>>>> design. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API and > > >>>> `show > > >>>>>>>>>> functions;` > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> SQL CLI are intended to return only the registered > > >> UDFs, > > >>>> not > > >>>>>>>>> including > > >>>>>>>>>>>> built-in functions. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This is also the behavior in previous versions. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Bowen Li < > > >>>> bowenl...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for RC2. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a bug > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13741, > > >>>>>>>>>> and I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it's a blocker. The bug means currently if > > >> users > > >>>>> call > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API or > > >> `show > > >>>>>>>> functions;` > > >>>>>>>>>>> thru > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL would not be able to see Flink's built-in > > >>> functions. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm preparing a fix right now. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bowen > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:55 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > >>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the test efforts, verifications and > > >>>> votes > > >>>>> so > > >>>>>>>> far. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So far, things are looking good, but we still > > >> require > > >>>> one > > >>>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>>> PMC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote for this RC to be the official release, so I > > >>> would > > >>>>>> like > > >>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> extend > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote time for 1 more day, until *Aug. 16th 17:00 > > >>> CET*. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, the release notes for 1.9.0 had > > >> only > > >>>>> just > > >>>>>>> been > > >>>>>>>>>>>> finalized > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], and could use a few more eyes before closing > > >> the > > >>>>> vote. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any help with checking if anything else should be > > >>>>> mentioned > > >>>>>>>> there > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaking changes / known shortcomings would be > > >>>>> appreciated. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:58 PM Kurt Young < > > >>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, then I have no other comments on legal > > >>> check. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:56 PM Chesnay Schepler > > >> < > > >>>>>>>>>>> ches...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The licensing items aren't a problem; we don't > > >>> care > > >>>>>> about > > >>>>>>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> modules > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in NOTICE files, and we don't have to update > > >> the > > >>>>>>>>> source-release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> licensing since we don't have a pre-built > > >> version > > >>>> of > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> WebUI > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/08/2019 15:22, Kurt Young wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After going through the licenses, I found 2 > > >>>>>> suspicions > > >>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid or not. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. flink-state-processing-api is packaged in > > >> to > > >>>>>>>> flink-dist > > >>>>>>>>>> jar, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE-binary file (the one under the root > > >>>>> directory) > > >>>>>>>> like > > >>>>>>>>>>> other > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modules. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. flink-runtime-web distributed some > > >>> JavaScript > > >>>>>>>>> dependencies > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> through > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes, the licenses and NOTICE file were only > > >>>>> updated > > >>>>>>>>> inside > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> module > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-runtime-web, but not the NOTICE file > > >> and > > >>>>>> licenses > > >>>>>>>>>>> directory > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the root directory. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another minor issue I just found is: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13558 tries to include table examples > > >> to > > >>>>>>>> flink-dist, > > >>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find it in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the binary distribution of RC2. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:19 PM Kurt Young < > > >>>>>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon & Timo, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, and I agree with > > >> it. > > >>> I > > >>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>> document > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release notes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:14 PM Tzu-Li > > >>> (Gordon) > > >>>>> Tai > > >>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the same argument as before, given > > >> that > > >>> it > > >>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement that it is a preview feature, > > >> I > > >>>>> would > > >>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>> block > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, it would be important to > > >>> mention > > >>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>> explicitly > > >>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release notes [1]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:29 AM Timo > > >>> Walther < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> twal...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that this is a serious bug. > > >>> However, I > > >>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>> block > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release because of this. As you said, > > >> there > > >>>> is a > > >>>>>>>>>> workaround > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `execute()` works in the most common case > > >>> of a > > >>>>>>> single > > >>>>>>>>>>>> execution. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix this in a minor release shortly after. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do others think? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.08.19 um 11:23 schrieb Kurt Young: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HI, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We just find a serious bug around blink > > >>>>> planner: > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When user reused the table environment > > >>>>> instance, > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> call > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> `execute` > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple times for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different sql, the later call will > > >> trigger > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>>> earlier > > >>>>>>>>>> ones > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-executed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a serious bug but seems we also > > >> have a > > >>>>> work > > >>>>>>>>> around, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reuse the table environment > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object. I'm not sure if we should treat > > >>> this > > >>>>> one > > >>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>> blocker > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's your opinion? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gary Yao > > >> < > > >>>>>>>>>>> g...@ververica.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jepsen test suite passed 10 times > > >>>>> consecutively > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha > > >>>>>> Krettek < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some testing on a Google Cloud > > >>>> Dataproc > > >>>>>>>> cluster > > >>>>>>>>>> (it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gives > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage > > >>>> (GCS)): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - tried both YARN session mode and > > >>> YARN > > >>>>>>> per-job > > >>>>>>>>>> mode, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> also > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a > > >> YARN > > >>>>>> session > > >>>>>>>>>> cluster > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran examples that write to GCS, > > >>> both > > >>>>> with > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> native > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileSystem > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a custom “plugin” FileSystem > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran stateful streaming jobs that > > >>> use > > >>>>> GCS > > >>>>>>> as a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> checkpoint > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backend > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - tried running SQL programs on > > >> YARN > > >>>>> using > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> SQL > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cli: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YARN session mode but not for YARN > > >>> per-job > > >>>>>> mode. > > >>>>>>>>>> Looking > > >>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t think per-job mode would work > > >> from > > >>>>> seeing > > >>>>>>> how > > >>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implemented. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it’s an OK restriction to have > > >>> for > > >>>>> now > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - in all the testing I had > > >>> fine-grained > > >>>>>>>> recovery > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (region > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failover) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled but I didn’t simulate any > > >>> failures > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young > > >> < > > >>>>>>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for preparing this release > > >>>>> candidate. I > > >>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>> verified > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - verified the checksums and GPG files > > >>>> match > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - verified that the source archives do > > >>> not > > >>>>>>>> contains > > >>>>>>>>>> any > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala > > >>> 2.11 > > >>>>>>>>>> successfully. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 > > >>> issuses > > >>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13687] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13688], > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both are not release blockers. Other > > >>> than > > >>>>>> that, > > >>>>>>>> all > > >>>>>>>>>>> tests > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran all e2e tests which don't need > > >>>>> download > > >>>>>>>>> external > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (it's > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unstable > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China and almost impossible to > > >>> download > > >>>>>>> them), > > >>>>>>>>> all > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started local cluster, ran some > > >>>> examples. > > >>>>>> Met > > >>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>> small > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> display > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13591], which is also not a > > >>> release > > >>>>>>>> blocker. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although we have pushed some fixes > > >>> around > > >>>>>> blink > > >>>>>>>>>> planner > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hive > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after RC2, but consider these are both > > >>>>> preview > > >>>>>>>>>> features, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lean > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without these fixes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from my side. (binding) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark > > >> Wu > > >>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the following things: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala > > >>>> 2.12 > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> Scala > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.11 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checked/verified signatures and > > >>> hashes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checked that all POM files point to > > >>> the > > >>>>>> same > > >>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran some flink table related > > >>> end-to-end > > >>>>>> tests > > >>>>>>>>>> locally > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> succeeded > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is > > >>>> reported > > >>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13704) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 > > >>> and > > >>>>>> 2.12, > > >>>>>>>> ran > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> examples, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to > > >>>>>> temporal > > >>>>>>>> join > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kafka > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mysql jdbc table, and write results > > >> to > > >>>>> kafka > > >>>>>>>> again. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Using > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DDL > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source and sinks. looks good. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - reviewed the release PR > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as > > >>>> blocker > > >>>>>>>> issue, > > >>>>>>>>> so > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> side > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (non-binding). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till > > >>>>> Rohrmann < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Richard, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> although I can see that it would be > > >>>> handy > > >>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>> users > > >>>>>>>>>>> who > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather not include examples > > >>>> which > > >>>>>>>> require > > >>>>>>>>> an > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> external > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the Flink distribution. I think > > >>>>>> examples > > >>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contained. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern is that we would bloat the > > >>>>>>> distribution > > >>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>> many > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think > > >> it > > >>>>> would > > >>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>> better > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples available differently, > > >> maybe > > >>>>>> through > > >>>>>>>>>> Flink's > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecosystem > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a new examples section in > > >>> Flink's > > >>>>>>>>>> documentation. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark > > >>> Wu > > >>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After thinking about we can use > > >>> VARCHAR > > >>>>> as > > >>>>>> an > > >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/time/date. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a > > >>>>> blocker > > >>>>>>>>> issue. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, > > >> Richard > > >>>>>>>>> Deurwaarder < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rich...@xeli.eu > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar > > >> is > > >>>> not > > >>>>>>>> included > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dir > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-dist. I've created > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will leave it up to you to > > >> decide > > >>> if > > >>>>> we > > >>>>>>> want > > >>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> add > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM > > >> Till > > >>>>>>> Rohrmann > > >>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. > > >>>> Could > > >>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limitation > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think > > >> we > > >>>>> have > > >>>>>>>> agreed > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be rather a preview feature > > >>> than > > >>>>>>>>> production > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hence > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still contain some bugs. My > > >> concern > > >>>> is > > >>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>> there > > >>>>>>>>>>>> might > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit > > >> by > > >>>> bit > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> postpone > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are > > >>>>>> blockers. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM > > >>> Jark > > >>>>> Wu < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just find an issue when > > >> testing > > >>>>>>> connector > > >>>>>>>>> DDLs > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> against > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rc2. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL > > >> doesn't > > >>>>> work > > >>>>>>> when > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> containing > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created an issue > > >>>> FLINK-13699[1] > > >>>>>>> and a > > >>>>>>>>>> pull > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue > > >>> of > > >>>>> 1.9 > > >>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are > > >> primitive > > >>>>> types, > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DDL > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I want to hear more > > >>>> thoughts > > >>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> community > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, > > >>> Becket > > >>>>>> Qin < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM > > >>>>> Tzu-Li > > >>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is a > > >> @PublicEvolving > > >>>>>>> interface, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> technically > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it across releases (including > > >>>> across > > >>>>>>>> bugfix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases?). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it > > >>>> now, > > >>>>>>> please > > >>>>>>>>>> mark > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in > > >>> the > > >>>>>> case a > > >>>>>>>> new > > >>>>>>>>>> RC > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check the list of changes > > >>> compared > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> previous > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding > > >>>> JIRAs > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> right > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 > > >>>>> instead > > >>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 > > >> PM > > >>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>> Rohrmann > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be > > >> nicer. > > >>>> Not > > >>>>>>> sure > > >>>>>>>>>>> whether > > >>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it > > >> is > > >>>>> open > > >>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>> quite > > >>>>>>>>>>>> some > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed until very > > >> recently. > > >>>>> Maybe > > >>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> include > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortlist > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we > > >>> do > > >>>> in > > >>>>>>> case > > >>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 > > >> PM > > >>>>>> Becket > > >>>>>>>> Qin > > >>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already > > >>>>>>> documented > > >>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> way. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technically > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to > > >> change > > >>> it > > >>>>>>> later. > > >>>>>>>> It > > >>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> just > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing that. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 > > >>> PM > > >>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>> Rohrmann > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the > > >> PubSub > > >>>>>>> connector > > >>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> public > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolving > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > > >> 3:18 > > >>> PM > > >>>>>>> Becket > > >>>>>>>>> Qin > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) > > >>> has a > > >>>>>> minor > > >>>>>>>>>> Google > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config > > >> rate > > >>>>>>> limiting. > > >>>>>>>>> The > > >>>>>>>>>>> GCP > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newly > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in > > >> 1.9, > > >>>> so > > >>>>> it > > >>>>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nice > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later > > >>> to > > >>>>>> avoid > > >>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>> public > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker > > >> for > > >>>>> 1.9. > > >>>>>>> Want > > >>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> check > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > > >> 2:04 > > >>>> PM > > >>>>>> Zili > > >>>>>>>>> Chen > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your > > >>> explanation. > > >>>>> For > > >>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>> think > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, > > >> like > > >>>>> unset > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>> fixed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test > > >>>> scope > > >>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>> wonder > > >>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> such > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. > > >> IIRC > > >>>>>>> previous > > >>>>>>>> RC > > >>>>>>>>>>> VOTE > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threads > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I > > >>> will > > >>>>> try > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>> look > > >>>>>>>>>> up > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young < > > >>> ykt...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:42写道： > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. > > >>>> The 2 > > >>>>>>>> issues > > >>>>>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the > > >>>> second > > >>>>>>> issue > > >>>>>>>>>> and a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PR > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing > > >>>>>> problem, > > >>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it > > >>> into > > >>>>> 1.9 > > >>>>>>>>> branch. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > > >>> 5:38 > > >>>>> PM > > >>>>>>> Zili > > >>>>>>>>>> Chen > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a > > >> few > > >>>>> hours > > >>>>>>> ago > > >>>>>>>>>> there > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> were > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as > > >>>> blockers > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0[1][2]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as > > >>>>>> duplication > > >>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>> still > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, > > >> while > > >>>> [2] > > >>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>> downgrade > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Major" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priority > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be > > >>>> fixed > > >>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to > > >> have > > >>>>>>> attention > > >>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>> our > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra < > > >>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:10写道： > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy > > >> enough, > > >>>> will > > >>>>>>> try! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 > > >> at > > >>>>> 11:00 > > >>>>>> AM > > >>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ewen > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting > > >>>> this. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply > > >>>> build > > >>>>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>>>>> without > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to > > >>> your > > >>>>>>> CloudEra > > >>>>>>>>>> libs? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the > > >> recommended > > >>>> way > > >>>>>>> these > > >>>>>>>>>> days. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 > > >> at > > >>>>> 10:48 > > >>>>>>> AM > > >>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fóra < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I > > >> also > > >>>>>> figured > > >>>>>>>> out > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set > > >>> to > > >>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> specific > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 > > >>> at > > >>>>> 9:54 > > >>>>>>> AM > > >>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wysakowicz > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >> dwysakow...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues > > >>> with > > >>>>> mapr > > >>>>>>>> maven > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the > > >>>>>>>> "unsafe-mapr-repo" > > >>>>>>>>>>>> profile. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 > > >> 19:31, > > >>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>> Fóra > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the > > >>> RC > > >>>>>>> locally > > >>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I > > >> do > > >>> I > > >>>>> run > > >>>>>>> into > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have > > >>>>> worked > > >>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> past. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be > > >> some > > >>>>>>>>> documentation > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any > > >>>> pointers > > >>>>> :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, > > >> 2019 > > >>>> at > > >>>>>> 6:57 > > >>>>>>>> PM > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fóra > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to > > >>> build > > >>>>>>>> 1.9.0-rc2 > > >>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following > > >>>>> error: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install > > >>>>>>> -DskipTests > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop > > >>>>> (ignore > > >>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to > > >>>>> execute > > >>>>>>>> goal > > >>>>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve > > >>> dependencies > > >>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>> project > > >>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > >> descriptor > > >>>> for > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( > > >>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ): > > >>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PKIX > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: > > >>>> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid > > >> certification > > >>>>> path > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> requested > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a > > >>> TLS > > >>>>>>> error. > > >>>>>>>>>> Might > > >>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to > > >>>> know. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, > > >> 2019 > > >>>> at > > >>>>>> 6:26 > > >>>>>>>> PM > > >>>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that > > >>> the > > >>>>>>>>> unresolved > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", > > >>> as > > >>>>> seen > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> JIRA > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents > > >>> for > > >>>>> new > > >>>>>>>>>> features. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them > > >>> still > > >>>>>>>>> associated > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for > > >> 1.9.0 > > >>>> soon > > >>>>>>> along > > >>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, > > >>> 2019 > > >>>> at > > >>>>>>> 6:17 > > >>>>>>>> PM > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >> tzuli...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release > > >> candidate > > >>>> #2 > > >>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>> Apache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the > > >> first > > >>>>>> voting > > >>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 > > >>> and > > >>>>> RC1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review > > >> and > > >>>>> vote > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve > > >>> the > > >>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not > > >>>>> approve > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (please > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete > > >>>> staging > > >>>>>> area > > >>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release > > >>>> notes > > >>>>>> [1], > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official > > >>>> Apache > > >>>>>>>> source > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to > > >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>> [2], > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > > >>>>>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts > > >>> to > > >>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> deployed > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Central > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code > > >> tag > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “release-1.9.0-rc2” > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also > > >>>>>> preparing > > >>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>> pull > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and > > >>> will > > >>>>>>> update > > >>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly > > >>>>>>> afterwards. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will > > >> be > > >>>> open > > >>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>> *at > > >>>>>>>>>>> least > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 72 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours*. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast > > >> your > > >>>>> votes > > >>>>>>>> before > > >>>>>>>>>>> *Aug. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14th > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Wed.) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2019, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by > > >>> majority > > >>>>>>>> approval, > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >
