Vote thread for RC3 has been started: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Flink-1-9-0-release-candidate-3-td31988.html
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 6:32 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the comments and fast fixes. > > @Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> I've quickly looked at the changes to > the PubSub connector. Given that it is a API-breaking change and is quite > local as a configuration change, I've decided to include that change in RC3. > @Jark @Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> I'll be adding FLINK-13699 as > well. > > Quick update regarding the LICENSE issue with flink-runtime-web: I've > doubled checked this and the licenses for the new bundled Javascript > dependencies are actually already correctly present under the root > licenses-binary/ directory, so we actually don't need additional changes > for this. > > I've started to create RC3 now, will post the vote as soon as it is ready. > > Cheers, > Gordon > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Looking at FLINK-13699, it seems to be very local to Table API and HBase >> connector. >> We can cherry-pick that without re-running distributed tests. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:46 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I've merged the fix for FLINK-13752. Hence we are good to go to create >> the >> > new RC. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Till >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:30 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > > I support Jark's fix for FLINK-13699 because it would be disappointing >> > > if both DDL and connectors are ready to handle DATE/TIME/TIMESTAMP >> but a >> > > little component in the middle of the stack is preventing an otherwise >> > > usable feature. The changes are minor. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Timo >> > > >> > > >> > > Am 19.08.19 um 13:24 schrieb Jark Wu: >> > > > Hi Gordon, >> > > > >> > > > I agree that we should pick the minimal set of changes to shorten >> the >> > > > release testing time. >> > > > However, I would like to include FLINK-13699 into RC3. FLINK-13699 >> is a >> > > > critical DDL issue, and is a small change to flink table (won't >> affect >> > > the >> > > > runtime feature and stability). >> > > > I will do some tests around sql and blink planner if the RC3 include >> > this >> > > > fix. >> > > > >> > > > But if the community against to include it, I'm also fine with >> having >> > it >> > > in >> > > > the next minor release. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Jark >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 16:16, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> +1 for Gordon's approach. >> > > >> >> > > >> If we do that, we can probably skip re-testing everything and >> mainly >> > > need >> > > >> to verify the release artifacts (signatures, build from source, >> etc.). >> > > >> >> > > >> If we open the RC up for changes, I fear a lot of small issues will >> > > rush in >> > > >> and destabilize the candidate again, meaning we have to do another >> > > larger >> > > >> testing effort. >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:48 AM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> Hi Gordon, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I remember we mentioned earlier that if there is an additional >> RC, we >> > > can >> > > >>> piggyback the GCP PubSub API change ( >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13231). It is a small >> > > patch >> > > >> to >> > > >>> avoid future API change. So should be able to merge it very >> shortly. >> > > >> Would >> > > >>> it be possible to include that into RC3 as well? >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Thanks, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:43 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < >> > > tzuli...@apache.org >> > > >>> >> > > >>> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> Hi, >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 turns out to >> be >> > an >> > > >>>> actual >> > > >>>> blocker, so we would have to close this RC now in favor of a new >> > one. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Since we are already quite past the planned release time for >> 1.9.0, >> > I >> > > >>> would >> > > >>>> like to limit the new changes included in RC3 to only the >> following: >> > > >>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 >> > > >>>> - Fix license and notice file issues that Kurt had found with >> > > >>>> flink-runtime-web and flink-state-processing-api >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> This means that I will not be creating RC3 with the release-1.9 >> > branch >> > > >> as >> > > >>>> is, but essentially only cherry-picking the above mentioned >> changes >> > on >> > > >>> top >> > > >>>> of RC2. >> > > >>>> The minimal set of changes on top of RC2 should allow us to carry >> > most >> > > >> if >> > > >>>> not all of the already existing votes without another round of >> > > >> extensive >> > > >>>> testing, and allow us to have a shortened voting time. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> I understand that there are other issues mentioned in this thread >> > that >> > > >>> are >> > > >>>> already spotted and merged to release-1.9, especially for the >> Blink >> > > >>> planner >> > > >>>> and DDL, but I suggest not to include them in RC3. >> > > >>>> I think it would be better to collect all the remaining issues >> for >> > > >> those >> > > >>>> over a period of time, and include them as 1.9.1 which can >> ideally >> > > also >> > > >>>> happen a few weeks soon after 1.9.0. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> What do you think? If there are not objections, I would proceed >> with >> > > >> this >> > > >>>> plan and push out a new RC by the end of today (Aug. 19th CET). >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Regards, >> > > >>>> Gordon >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:09 AM Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >>>>> We should investigate the performance regression but regardless >> the >> > > >>>>> regression I vote +1 >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Have verified following things >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> - Jobs running on YARN x (Session & Per Job) with >> high-availability >> > > >>>>> enabled. >> > > >>>>> - Simulate JM and TM failures. >> > > >>>>> - Simulate temporary network partition. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>> tison. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年8月18日周日 下午10:12写道： >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> For reference, this is the JIRA issue about the regression in >> > > >>> question: >> > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:57 AM Guowei Ma < >> guowei....@gmail.com> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> Hi, till >> > > >>>>>>> I can send the job to you offline. >> > > >>>>>>> It is just a datastream job and does not use >> > > >>>>>> TwoInputSelectableStreamTask. >> > > >>>>>>> A->B >> > > >>>>>>> \ >> > > >>>>>>> C >> > > >>>>>>> / >> > > >>>>>>> D->E >> > > >>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>> Guowei >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午4:34写道： >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this issue Guowei. Could you share a bit >> > > >>> more >> > > >>>>>>> details >> > > >>>>>>>> what the job exactly does and which operators it uses? Does >> the >> > > >>> job >> > > >>>>>> uses >> > > >>>>>>>> the new `TwoInputSelectableStreamTask` which might cause the >> > > >>>>>> performance >> > > >>>>>>>> regression? >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> I think it is important to understand where the problem comes >> > > >>> from >> > > >>>>>> before >> > > >>>>>>>> we proceed with the release. >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:27 AM Guowei Ma < >> > > >> guowei....@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, >> > > >>>>>>>>> -1 >> > > >>>>>>>>> We have a benchmark job, which includes a two-input >> operator. >> > > >>>>>>>>> This job has a big performance regression using 1.9 compared >> > > >> to >> > > >>>>> 1.8. >> > > >>>>>>>>> It's still not very clear why this regression happens. >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>> Guowei >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午3:27写道： >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - checked release notes: OK >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - checked sums and signatures: OK >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - source release >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - contains no binaries: OK >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - contains no 1.9-SNAPSHOT references: OK >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - build from source: OK (8u102) >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - mvn clean verify: OK (8u102) >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - binary release >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - no examples appear to be missing >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - started a cluster; WebUI reachable, example ran >> > > >>>>> successfully >> > > >>>>>>>>>> - repository appears to contain all expected artifacts >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Yu >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:06, Bowen Li < >> > > >> bowenl...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for letting me know that it's been like this in >> > > >>>> previous >> > > >>>>>>>>> releases. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Though I don't think that's the right behavior, it can be >> > > >>>>>> discussed >> > > >>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> later release. Thus I retract my -1 for RC2. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Bowen >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jark Wu < >> > > >> imj...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bowen, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> However, I don't think this is an issue. IMO, it is by >> > > >>>>> design. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API and >> > > >>>> `show >> > > >>>>>>>>>> functions;` >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> SQL CLI are intended to return only the registered >> > > >> UDFs, >> > > >>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>> including >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> built-in functions. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This is also the behavior in previous versions. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jark >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Bowen Li < >> > > >>>> bowenl...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for RC2. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a bug >> > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13741, >> > > >>>>>>>>>> and I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it's a blocker. The bug means currently if >> > > >> users >> > > >>>>> call >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API or >> > > >> `show >> > > >>>>>>>> functions;` >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> thru >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL would not be able to see Flink's built-in >> > > >>> functions. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm preparing a fix right now. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bowen >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:55 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the test efforts, verifications and >> > > >>>> votes >> > > >>>>> so >> > > >>>>>>>> far. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So far, things are looking good, but we still >> > > >> require >> > > >>>> one >> > > >>>>>>> more >> > > >>>>>>>>> PMC >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote for this RC to be the official release, so I >> > > >>> would >> > > >>>>>> like >> > > >>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> extend >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote time for 1 more day, until *Aug. 16th 17:00 >> > > >>> CET*. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, the release notes for 1.9.0 had >> > > >> only >> > > >>>>> just >> > > >>>>>>> been >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> finalized >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], and could use a few more eyes before closing >> > > >> the >> > > >>>>> vote. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any help with checking if anything else should be >> > > >>>>> mentioned >> > > >>>>>>>> there >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaking changes / known shortcomings would be >> > > >>>>> appreciated. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:58 PM Kurt Young < >> > > >>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, then I have no other comments on legal >> > > >>> check. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:56 PM Chesnay Schepler >> > > >> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ches...@apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The licensing items aren't a problem; we don't >> > > >>> care >> > > >>>>>> about >> > > >>>>>>>>> Flink >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> modules >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in NOTICE files, and we don't have to update >> > > >> the >> > > >>>>>>>>> source-release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> licensing since we don't have a pre-built >> > > >> version >> > > >>>> of >> > > >>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>> WebUI >> > > >>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/08/2019 15:22, Kurt Young wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After going through the licenses, I found 2 >> > > >>>>>> suspicions >> > > >>>>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid or not. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. flink-state-processing-api is packaged in >> > > >> to >> > > >>>>>>>> flink-dist >> > > >>>>>>>>>> jar, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE-binary file (the one under the root >> > > >>>>> directory) >> > > >>>>>>>> like >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> other >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modules. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. flink-runtime-web distributed some >> > > >>> JavaScript >> > > >>>>>>>>> dependencies >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> through >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes, the licenses and NOTICE file were only >> > > >>>>> updated >> > > >>>>>>>>> inside >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> module >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-runtime-web, but not the NOTICE file >> > > >> and >> > > >>>>>> licenses >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> directory >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the root directory. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another minor issue I just found is: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13558 tries to include table examples >> > > >> to >> > > >>>>>>>> flink-dist, >> > > >>>>>>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find it in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the binary distribution of RC2. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:19 PM Kurt Young < >> > > >>>>>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon & Timo, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, and I agree with >> > > >> it. >> > > >>> I >> > > >>>>> will >> > > >>>>>>>>>> document >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release notes. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:14 PM Tzu-Li >> > > >>> (Gordon) >> > > >>>>> Tai >> > > >>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the same argument as before, given >> > > >> that >> > > >>> it >> > > >>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement that it is a preview feature, >> > > >> I >> > > >>>>> would >> > > >>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>> block >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, it would be important to >> > > >>> mention >> > > >>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> explicitly >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release notes [1]. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:29 AM Timo >> > > >>> Walther < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> twal...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that this is a serious bug. >> > > >>> However, I >> > > >>>>>> would >> > > >>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> block >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release because of this. As you said, >> > > >> there >> > > >>>> is a >> > > >>>>>>>>>> workaround >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `execute()` works in the most common case >> > > >>> of a >> > > >>>>>>> single >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> execution. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix this in a minor release shortly after. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do others think? >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.08.19 um 11:23 schrieb Kurt Young: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HI, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We just find a serious bug around blink >> > > >>>>> planner: >> > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When user reused the table environment >> > > >>>>> instance, >> > > >>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>> call >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> `execute` >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple times for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different sql, the later call will >> > > >> trigger >> > > >>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>> earlier >> > > >>>>>>>>>> ones >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-executed. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a serious bug but seems we also >> > > >> have a >> > > >>>>> work >> > > >>>>>>>>> around, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reuse the table environment >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object. I'm not sure if we should treat >> > > >>> this >> > > >>>>> one >> > > >>>>>> as >> > > >>>>>>>>>> blocker >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's your opinion? >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gary Yao >> > > >> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> g...@ververica.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jepsen test suite passed 10 times >> > > >>>>> consecutively >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha >> > > >>>>>> Krettek < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some testing on a Google Cloud >> > > >>>> Dataproc >> > > >>>>>>>> cluster >> > > >>>>>>>>>> (it >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gives >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage >> > > >>>> (GCS)): >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - tried both YARN session mode and >> > > >>> YARN >> > > >>>>>>> per-job >> > > >>>>>>>>>> mode, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> also >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a >> > > >> YARN >> > > >>>>>> session >> > > >>>>>>>>>> cluster >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran examples that write to GCS, >> > > >>> both >> > > >>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> native >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileSystem >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a custom “plugin” FileSystem >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran stateful streaming jobs that >> > > >>> use >> > > >>>>> GCS >> > > >>>>>>> as a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> checkpoint >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backend >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - tried running SQL programs on >> > > >> YARN >> > > >>>>> using >> > > >>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>> SQL >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cli: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YARN session mode but not for YARN >> > > >>> per-job >> > > >>>>>> mode. >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Looking >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t think per-job mode would work >> > > >> from >> > > >>>>> seeing >> > > >>>>>>> how >> > > >>>>>>>>> it >> > > >>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implemented. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it’s an OK restriction to have >> > > >>> for >> > > >>>>> now >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - in all the testing I had >> > > >>> fine-grained >> > > >>>>>>>> recovery >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (region >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failover) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled but I didn’t simulate any >> > > >>> failures >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young >> > > >> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for preparing this release >> > > >>>>> candidate. I >> > > >>>>>>>> have >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> verified >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - verified the checksums and GPG files >> > > >>>> match >> > > >>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - verified that the source archives do >> > > >>> not >> > > >>>>>>>> contains >> > > >>>>>>>>>> any >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala >> > > >>> 2.11 >> > > >>>>>>>>>> successfully. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 >> > > >>> issuses >> > > >>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13687] >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13688], >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both are not release blockers. Other >> > > >>> than >> > > >>>>>> that, >> > > >>>>>>>> all >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> tests >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran all e2e tests which don't need >> > > >>>>> download >> > > >>>>>>>>> external >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (it's >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unstable >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China and almost impossible to >> > > >>> download >> > > >>>>>>> them), >> > > >>>>>>>>> all >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started local cluster, ran some >> > > >>>> examples. >> > > >>>>>> Met >> > > >>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>> small >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> display >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13591], which is also not a >> > > >>> release >> > > >>>>>>>> blocker. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although we have pushed some fixes >> > > >>> around >> > > >>>>>> blink >> > > >>>>>>>>>> planner >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hive >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after RC2, but consider these are both >> > > >>>>> preview >> > > >>>>>>>>>> features, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lean >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without these fixes. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from my side. (binding) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark >> > > >> Wu >> > > >>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the following things: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala >> > > >>>> 2.12 >> > > >>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>> Scala >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.11 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checked/verified signatures and >> > > >>> hashes >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checked that all POM files point to >> > > >>> the >> > > >>>>>> same >> > > >>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran some flink table related >> > > >>> end-to-end >> > > >>>>>> tests >> > > >>>>>>>>>> locally >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> succeeded >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is >> > > >>>> reported >> > > >>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13704) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 >> > > >>> and >> > > >>>>>> 2.12, >> > > >>>>>>>> ran >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> examples, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to >> > > >>>>>> temporal >> > > >>>>>>>> join >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kafka >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mysql jdbc table, and write results >> > > >> to >> > > >>>>> kafka >> > > >>>>>>>> again. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Using >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DDL >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source and sinks. looks good. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - reviewed the release PR >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as >> > > >>>> blocker >> > > >>>>>>>> issue, >> > > >>>>>>>>> so >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> side >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (non-binding). >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till >> > > >>>>> Rohrmann < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Richard, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> although I can see that it would be >> > > >>>> handy >> > > >>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>> users >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> who >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather not include examples >> > > >>>> which >> > > >>>>>>>> require >> > > >>>>>>>>> an >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> external >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the Flink distribution. I think >> > > >>>>>> examples >> > > >>>>>>>>> should >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contained. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern is that we would bloat the >> > > >>>>>>> distribution >> > > >>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> many >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think >> > > >> it >> > > >>>>> would >> > > >>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>> better >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples available differently, >> > > >> maybe >> > > >>>>>> through >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Flink's >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecosystem >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a new examples section in >> > > >>> Flink's >> > > >>>>>>>>>> documentation. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark >> > > >>> Wu >> > > >>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After thinking about we can use >> > > >>> VARCHAR >> > > >>>>> as >> > > >>>>>> an >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/time/date. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a >> > > >>>>> blocker >> > > >>>>>>>>> issue. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, >> > > >> Richard >> > > >>>>>>>>> Deurwaarder < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rich...@xeli.eu >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar >> > > >> is >> > > >>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>> included >> > > >>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples/ >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dir >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-dist. I've created >> > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + >> > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fix >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will leave it up to you to >> > > >> decide >> > > >>> if >> > > >>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>> want >> > > >>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> add >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM >> > > >> Till >> > > >>>>>>> Rohrmann >> > > >>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. >> > > >>>> Could >> > > >>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limitation >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think >> > > >> we >> > > >>>>> have >> > > >>>>>>>> agreed >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be rather a preview feature >> > > >>> than >> > > >>>>>>>>> production >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hence >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still contain some bugs. My >> > > >> concern >> > > >>>> is >> > > >>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>> there >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> might >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit >> > > >> by >> > > >>>> bit >> > > >>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>> could >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> postpone >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are >> > > >>>>>> blockers. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM >> > > >>> Jark >> > > >>>>> Wu < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just find an issue when >> > > >> testing >> > > >>>>>>> connector >> > > >>>>>>>>> DDLs >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> against >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rc2. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL >> > > >> doesn't >> > > >>>>> work >> > > >>>>>>> when >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> containing >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created an issue >> > > >>>> FLINK-13699[1] >> > > >>>>>>> and a >> > > >>>>>>>>>> pull >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue >> > > >>> of >> > > >>>>> 1.9 >> > > >>>>>>>>> release. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are >> > > >> primitive >> > > >>>>> types, >> > > >>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> will >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DDL >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I want to hear more >> > > >>>> thoughts >> > > >>>>>> from >> > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> community >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, >> > > >>> Becket >> > > >>>>>> Qin < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM >> > > >>>>> Tzu-Li >> > > >>>>>>>>> (Gordon) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is a >> > > >> @PublicEvolving >> > > >>>>>>> interface, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> technically >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it across releases (including >> > > >>>> across >> > > >>>>>>>> bugfix >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases?). >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it >> > > >>>> now, >> > > >>>>>>> please >> > > >>>>>>>>>> mark >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in >> > > >>> the >> > > >>>>>> case a >> > > >>>>>>>> new >> > > >>>>>>>>>> RC >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check the list of changes >> > > >>> compared >> > > >>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> previous >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fix >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding >> > > >>>> JIRAs >> > > >>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> right >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 >> > > >>>>> instead >> > > >>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1). >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 >> > > >> PM >> > > >>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>>> Rohrmann >> > > >>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be >> > > >> nicer. >> > > >>>> Not >> > > >>>>>>> sure >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> whether >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it >> > > >> is >> > > >>>>> open >> > > >>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>> quite >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> some >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed until very >> > > >> recently. >> > > >>>>> Maybe >> > > >>>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>>>> could >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> include >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortlist >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we >> > > >>> do >> > > >>>> in >> > > >>>>>>> case >> > > >>>>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 >> > > >> PM >> > > >>>>>> Becket >> > > >>>>>>>> Qin >> > > >>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already >> > > >>>>>>> documented >> > > >>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> way. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technically >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to >> > > >> change >> > > >>> it >> > > >>>>>>> later. >> > > >>>>>>>> It >> > > >>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> just >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing that. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 >> > > >>> PM >> > > >>>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Rohrmann >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the >> > > >> PubSub >> > > >>>>>>> connector >> > > >>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> public >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolving >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead? >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at >> > > >> 3:18 >> > > >>> PM >> > > >>>>>>> Becket >> > > >>>>>>>>> Qin >> > > >>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) >> > > >>> has a >> > > >>>>>> minor >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Google >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config >> > > >> rate >> > > >>>>>>> limiting. >> > > >>>>>>>>> The >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> GCP >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newly >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in >> > > >> 1.9, >> > > >>>> so >> > > >>>>> it >> > > >>>>>>>> would >> > > >>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nice >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later >> > > >>> to >> > > >>>>>> avoid >> > > >>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>> public >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker >> > > >> for >> > > >>>>> 1.9. >> > > >>>>>>> Want >> > > >>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> check >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at >> > > >> 2:04 >> > > >>>> PM >> > > >>>>>> Zili >> > > >>>>>>>>> Chen >> > > >>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your >> > > >>> explanation. >> > > >>>>> For >> > > >>>>>>> [1] >> > > >>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> think >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, >> > > >> like >> > > >>>>> unset >> > > >>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>> fixed >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test >> > > >>>> scope >> > > >>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>> wonder >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> if >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. >> > > >> IIRC >> > > >>>>>>> previous >> > > >>>>>>>> RC >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> VOTE >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threads >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I >> > > >>> will >> > > >>>>> try >> > > >>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>> look >> > > >>>>>>>>>> up >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young < >> > > >>> ykt...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 于2019年8月12日周一 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:42写道： >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. >> > > >>>> The 2 >> > > >>>>>>>> issues >> > > >>>>>>>>>> you >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the >> > > >>>> second >> > > >>>>>>> issue >> > > >>>>>>>>>> and a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PR >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing >> > > >>>>>> problem, >> > > >>>>>>>>> should >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it >> > > >>> into >> > > >>>>> 1.9 >> > > >>>>>>>>> branch. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at >> > > >>> 5:38 >> > > >>>>> PM >> > > >>>>>>> Zili >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Chen >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a >> > > >> few >> > > >>>>> hours >> > > >>>>>>> ago >> > > >>>>>>>>>> there >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> were >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as >> > > >>>> blockers >> > > >>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0[1][2]. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as >> > > >>>>>> duplication >> > > >>>>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> still >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, >> > > >> while >> > > >>>> [2] >> > > >>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> downgrade >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Major" >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priority >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be >> > > >>>> fixed >> > > >>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to >> > > >> have >> > > >>>>>>> attention >> > > >>>>>>>>> of >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> our >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra < >> > > >>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 于2019年8月12日周一 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:10写道： >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy >> > > >> enough, >> > > >>>> will >> > > >>>>>>> try! >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 >> > > >> at >> > > >>>>> 11:00 >> > > >>>>>> AM >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Stephan >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ewen >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting >> > > >>>> this. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply >> > > >>>> build >> > > >>>>>>> Flink >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> without >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to >> > > >>> your >> > > >>>>>>> CloudEra >> > > >>>>>>>>>> libs? >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the >> > > >> recommended >> > > >>>> way >> > > >>>>>>> these >> > > >>>>>>>>>> days. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 >> > > >> at >> > > >>>>> 10:48 >> > > >>>>>>> AM >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fóra < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I >> > > >> also >> > > >>>>>> figured >> > > >>>>>>>> out >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set >> > > >>> to >> > > >>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>> specific >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 >> > > >>> at >> > > >>>>> 9:54 >> > > >>>>>>> AM >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Dawid >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wysakowicz >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >> dwysakow...@apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues >> > > >>> with >> > > >>>>> mapr >> > > >>>>>>>> maven >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the >> > > >>>>>>>> "unsafe-mapr-repo" >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> profile. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 >> > > >> 19:31, >> > > >>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>> Fóra >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the >> > > >>> RC >> > > >>>>>>> locally >> > > >>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I >> > > >> do >> > > >>> I >> > > >>>>> run >> > > >>>>>>> into >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have >> > > >>>>> worked >> > > >>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> past. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be >> > > >> some >> > > >>>>>>>>> documentation >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any >> > > >>>> pointers >> > > >>>>> :) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, >> > > >> 2019 >> > > >>>> at >> > > >>>>>> 6:57 >> > > >>>>>>>> PM >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fóra >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to >> > > >>> build >> > > >>>>>>>> 1.9.0-rc2 >> > > >>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following >> > > >>>>> error: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install >> > > >>>>>>> -DskipTests >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop >> > > >>>>> (ignore >> > > >>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to >> > > >>>>> execute >> > > >>>>>>>> goal >> > > >>>>>>>>> on >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve >> > > >>> dependencies >> > > >>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>> project >> > > >>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact >> > > >> descriptor >> > > >>>> for >> > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact >> > > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( >> > > >>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ): >> > > >>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PKIX >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: >> > > >>>> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid >> > > >> certification >> > > >>>>> path >> > > >>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> requested >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a >> > > >>> TLS >> > > >>>>>>> error. >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Might >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> not >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to >> > > >>>> know. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, >> > > >> 2019 >> > > >>>> at >> > > >>>>>> 6:26 >> > > >>>>>>>> PM >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that >> > > >>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>> unresolved >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", >> > > >>> as >> > > >>>>> seen >> > > >>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> JIRA >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notes >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents >> > > >>> for >> > > >>>>> new >> > > >>>>>>>>>> features. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them >> > > >>> still >> > > >>>>>>>>> associated >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for >> > > >> 1.9.0 >> > > >>>> soon >> > > >>>>>>> along >> > > >>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, >> > > >>> 2019 >> > > >>>> at >> > > >>>>>>> 6:17 >> > > >>>>>>>> PM >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> > > >> tzuli...@apache.org> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release >> > > >> candidate >> > > >>>> #2 >> > > >>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>> Apache >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the >> > > >> first >> > > >>>>>> voting >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> candidate >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 >> > > >>> and >> > > >>>>> RC1. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review >> > > >> and >> > > >>>>> vote >> > > >>>>>> on >> > > >>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve >> > > >>> the >> > > >>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not >> > > >>>>> approve >> > > >>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (please >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete >> > > >>>> staging >> > > >>>>>> area >> > > >>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release >> > > >>>> notes >> > > >>>>>> [1], >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official >> > > >>>> Apache >> > > >>>>>>>> source >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to >> > > >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org >> > > >>>>>>>>>> [2], >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint >> > > >>>>>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts >> > > >>> to >> > > >>>> be >> > > >>>>>>>>> deployed >> > > >>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Central >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code >> > > >> tag >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “release-1.9.0-rc2” >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also >> > > >>>>>> preparing >> > > >>>>>>> a >> > > >>>>>>>>> pull >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and >> > > >>> will >> > > >>>>>>> update >> > > >>>>>>>>> this >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly >> > > >>>>>>> afterwards. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will >> > > >> be >> > > >>>> open >> > > >>>>>> for >> > > >>>>>>>> *at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> least >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 72 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours*. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast >> > > >> your >> > > >>>>> votes >> > > >>>>>>>> before >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> *Aug. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14th >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Wed.) >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2019, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by >> > > >>> majority >> > > >>>>>>>> approval, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> with >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> > > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] >> > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] >> > > >>> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
