Hi Jark, Thanks for letting me know that it's been like this in previous releases. Though I don't think that's the right behavior, it can be discussed for later release. Thus I retract my -1 for RC2.
Bowen On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bowen, > > Thanks for reporting this. > However, I don't think this is an issue. IMO, it is by design. > The `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API and `show functions;` in > SQL CLI are intended to return only the registered UDFs, not including > built-in functions. > This is also the behavior in previous versions. > > Best, > Jark > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > -1 for RC2. > > > > I found a bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13741, and I > > think it's a blocker. The bug means currently if users call > > `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API or `show functions;` thru > > SQL would not be able to see Flink's built-in functions. > > > > I'm preparing a fix right now. > > > > Bowen > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:55 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for all the test efforts, verifications and votes so far. > > > > > > So far, things are looking good, but we still require one more PMC > > binding > > > vote for this RC to be the official release, so I would like to extend > > the > > > vote time for 1 more day, until *Aug. 16th 17:00 CET*. > > > > > > In the meantime, the release notes for 1.9.0 had only just been > finalized > > > [1], and could use a few more eyes before closing the vote. > > > Any help with checking if anything else should be mentioned there > > regarding > > > breaking changes / known shortcomings would be appreciated. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Gordon > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:58 PM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Great, then I have no other comments on legal check. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:56 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > The licensing items aren't a problem; we don't care about Flink > > modules > > > > > in NOTICE files, and we don't have to update the source-release > > > > > licensing since we don't have a pre-built version of the WebUI in > the > > > > > source. > > > > > > > > > > On 15/08/2019 15:22, Kurt Young wrote: > > > > > > After going through the licenses, I found 2 suspicions but not > sure > > > if > > > > > they > > > > > > are > > > > > > valid or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. flink-state-processing-api is packaged in to flink-dist jar, > but > > > not > > > > > > included in > > > > > > NOTICE-binary file (the one under the root directory) like other > > > > modules. > > > > > > 2. flink-runtime-web distributed some JavaScript dependencies > > through > > > > > source > > > > > > codes, the licenses and NOTICE file were only updated inside the > > > module > > > > > of > > > > > > flink-runtime-web, but not the NOTICE file and licenses directory > > > which > > > > > > under > > > > > > the root directory. > > > > > > > > > > > > Another minor issue I just found is: > > > > > > FLINK-13558 tries to include table examples to flink-dist, but I > > > cannot > > > > > > find it in > > > > > > the binary distribution of RC2. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:19 PM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Gordon & Timo, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks for the feedback, and I agree with it. I will document > this > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > >> release notes. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Best, > > > > > >> Kurt > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:14 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi Kurt, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> With the same argument as before, given that it is mentioned in > > the > > > > > >>> release > > > > > >>> announcement that it is a preview feature, I would not block > this > > > > > release > > > > > >>> because of it. > > > > > >>> Nevertheless, it would be important to mention this explicitly > in > > > the > > > > > >>> release notes [1]. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Regards, > > > > > >>> Gordon > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:29 AM Timo Walther < > > twal...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Hi Kurt, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I agree that this is a serious bug. However, I would not block > > the > > > > > >>>> release because of this. As you said, there is a workaround > and > > > the > > > > > >>>> `execute()` works in the most common case of a single > execution. > > > We > > > > > can > > > > > >>>> fix this in a minor release shortly after. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> What do others think? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>> Timo > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Am 15.08.19 um 11:23 schrieb Kurt Young: > > > > > >>>>> HI, > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> We just find a serious bug around blink planner: > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708 > > > > > >>>>> When user reused the table environment instance, and call > > > `execute` > > > > > >>>> method > > > > > >>>>> multiple times for > > > > > >>>>> different sql, the later call will trigger the earlier ones > to > > be > > > > > >>>>> re-executed. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> It's a serious bug but seems we also have a work around, > which > > is > > > > > >>> never > > > > > >>>>> reuse the table environment > > > > > >>>>> object. I'm not sure if we should treat this one as blocker > > issue > > > > of > > > > > >>>> 1.9.0. > > > > > >>>>> What's your opinion? > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>> Kurt > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gary Yao <g...@ververica.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Jepsen test suite passed 10 times consecutively > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha Krettek < > > > > > >>> aljos...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> +1 > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> I did some testing on a Google Cloud Dataproc cluster (it > > gives > > > > you > > > > > >>> a > > > > > >>>>>>> managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage (GCS)): > > > > > >>>>>>> - tried both YARN session mode and YARN per-job mode, > > also > > > > > using > > > > > >>>>>>> bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a YARN session cluster > > > > > >>>>>>> - ran examples that write to GCS, both with the native > > > Hadoop > > > > > >>>>>> FileSystem > > > > > >>>>>>> and a custom “plugin” FileSystem > > > > > >>>>>>> - ran stateful streaming jobs that use GCS as a > > checkpoint > > > > > >>> backend > > > > > >>>>>>> - tried running SQL programs on YARN using the SQL Cli: > > > this > > > > > >>> worked > > > > > >>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>> YARN session mode but not for YARN per-job mode. Looking at > > the > > > > > >>> code I > > > > > >>>>>>> don’t think per-job mode would work from seeing how it is > > > > > >>> implemented. > > > > > >>>>>> But > > > > > >>>>>>> I think it’s an OK restriction to have for now > > > > > >>>>>>> - in all the testing I had fine-grained recovery > (region > > > > > >>> failover) > > > > > >>>>>>> enabled but I didn’t simulate any failures > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi, > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for preparing this release candidate. I have > verified > > > the > > > > > >>>>>>> following: > > > > > >>>>>>>> - verified the checksums and GPG files match the > > corresponding > > > > > >>> release > > > > > >>>>>>> files > > > > > >>>>>>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any > > > binaries > > > > > >>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.11 successfully. > > > > > >>>>>>>> - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 issuses [FLINK-13687] > and > > > > > >>>>>>> [FLINK-13688], > > > > > >>>>>>>> but > > > > > >>>>>>>> both are not release blockers. Other than that, all tests > > are > > > > > >>> passed. > > > > > >>>>>>>> - ran all e2e tests which don't need download external > > > packages > > > > > >>> (it's > > > > > >>>>>>> very > > > > > >>>>>>>> unstable > > > > > >>>>>>>> in China and almost impossible to download them), all > > passed. > > > > > >>>>>>>> - started local cluster, ran some examples. Met a small > > > website > > > > > >>>> display > > > > > >>>>>>>> issue > > > > > >>>>>>>> [FLINK-13591], which is also not a release blocker. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Although we have pushed some fixes around blink planner > and > > > hive > > > > > >>>>>>>> integration > > > > > >>>>>>>> after RC2, but consider these are both preview features, > I'm > > > > lean > > > > > >>> to > > > > > >>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>> ok > > > > > >>>>>>>> to release > > > > > >>>>>>>> without these fixes. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> +1 from my side. (binding) > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>> Kurt > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I have verified the following things: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 > > > > > >>>> successfully > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - checked/verified signatures and hashes > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - ran some flink table related end-to-end tests locally > and > > > > > >>> succeeded > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is reported in > FLINK-13704) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran > > examples, > > > > > >>>> verified > > > > > >>>>>>> web > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to temporal join with > > > kafka > > > > > >>> source > > > > > >>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>> mysql jdbc table, and write results to kafka again. Using > > DDL > > > > to > > > > > >>>>>> create > > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> source and sinks. looks good. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - reviewed the release PR > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as blocker issue, so +1 > > from > > > > my > > > > > >>> side > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (non-binding). > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till Rohrmann < > > > > > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Richard, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> although I can see that it would be handy for users who > > have > > > > > >>> PubSub > > > > > >>>>>> set > > > > > >>>>>>>>> up, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I would rather not include examples which require an > > > external > > > > > >>>>>>> dependency > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> into the Flink distribution. I think examples should be > > > > > >>>>>> self-contained. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> My > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> concern is that we would bloat the distribution for many > > > users > > > > > at > > > > > >>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think it would be better to > > > make > > > > > >>> these > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> examples available differently, maybe through Flink's > > > > ecosystem > > > > > >>>>>> website > > > > > >>>>>>>>> or > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> maybe a new examples section in Flink's documentation. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark Wu < > imj...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> After thinking about we can use VARCHAR as an > alternative > > > of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/time/date. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a blocker issue. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, Richard Deurwaarder < > > > > > >>> rich...@xeli.eu > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar is not included in > the > > > > > >>> examples/ > > > > > >>>>>> dir > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> flink-dist. I've created > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> + https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files to > > fix > > > > > this. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I will leave it up to you to decide if we want to add > > this > > > > to > > > > > >>>>>> 1.9.0. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Richard > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM Till Rohrmann < > > > > > >>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. Could this be a > > > documented > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> limitation > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think we have agreed that > > the > > > > > Blink > > > > > >>>> SQL > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> planner > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> will be rather a preview feature than production > ready. > > > > Hence > > > > > >>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> could > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> still contain some bugs. My concern is that there > might > > > be > > > > > >>> still > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> other > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit by bit and could > > postpone > > > > the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> even > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are blockers. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM Jark Wu < > > > imj...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just find an issue when testing connector DDLs > > against > > > > > >>> blink > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> planner > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rc2. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL doesn't work when > > containing > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> type. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] and a pull > > > request > > > > > for > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue of 1.9 release. > > Because > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are primitive types, and this > will > > > > break > > > > > >>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> DDL > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I want to hear more thoughts from the > > community > > > > > >>> whether > > > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket Qin < > > > > > >>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) > Tai < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, > > technically > > > > it > > > > > >>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ok > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> break > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it across releases (including across bugfix > > > releases?). > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark > the > > > fix > > > > > >>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> as > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in the case a new RC is > > > > > created, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> usually > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check the list of changes compared to the previous > > RC, > > > > and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> correct > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fix > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the > right > > > > > version > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> case, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1). > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether > we > > > > > should > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> cancel > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it is open for quite > some > > > > time > > > > > >>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could > > include > > > > it > > > > > >>> on > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortlist > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the > > RC > > > > gets > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that > > way. > > > > So > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> technically > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is > just > > > > > better > > > > > >>>>>>>>> if > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing that. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the PubSub connector is > public > > > > > >>> evolving > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> instead? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google > > PubSub > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> connector > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> API > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP > > > > PubSub > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> connector > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newly > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be > nice > > > to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> include > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public > API > > > > > >>>>>>>>> change. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> am > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to > check > > > what > > > > > do > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> others > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think > at > > > > least > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> we > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed > > > version. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> For > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test scope but wonder if > > > such > > > > a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> commit > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE > > > > threads > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I will try to look up > it, > > > > too. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 下午5:42写道： > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you > > > > mentioned > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> were > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the second issue and a > PR > > > was > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> opened > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing problem, should not > > be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> blocker > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it into 1.9 branch. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a few hours ago there > > were > > > > > >>>>>>>>> two > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> new > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as blockers to > 1.9.0[1][2]. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as duplication but still > > > marked > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> as > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade > to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> "Major" > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priority > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to have attention of our > > > > > >>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> manager > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:10写道： > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy enough, will try! > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan > > Ewen > > > < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply build Flink without > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hadoop > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the recommended way these days. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula > > Fóra < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I also figured out that > I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> need > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> project > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set to the specific > > hadoop > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Wysakowicz > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dwysakow...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues with mapr maven > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> repository, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" > profile. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the RC locally with the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I do I run into > > > > > >>>>>>>>> dependency > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have worked in the past. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be some documentation > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> somewhere > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any pointers :) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Fóra > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following error: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install -DskipTests > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> project > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve dependencies for project > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact descriptor for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ): > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PKIX > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid certification path to requested > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> target > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a TLS error. Might > not > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> related > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to know. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that the unresolved > > > > > >>>>>>>>> issues > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notes > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents for new features. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them still associated with > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> since > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with > the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> official > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM > Tzu-Li > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the first voting candidate > > > > > >>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 and RC1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #2 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (please > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is > > > > > >>>>>>>>> available > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source > release > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> which > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Central > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag > > > > > >>>>>>>>> “release-1.9.0-rc2” > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [5]. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also preparing a pull > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> request > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and will update this > > > > > >>>>>>>>> voting > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thread > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly afterwards. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for *at least > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 72 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hours*. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 14th > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Wed.) > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2019, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by majority approval, with > > > > > >>>>>>>>> at > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> least > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > > > > >>> > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
