Hi Jark, FLINK-4469: I agree, UDTFs would be a great feature. I don't think we should make it a blocker but I will help to get it the master before the feature freeze. FLINK-4704: Regarding the renaming of the namespace, we have two positive votes in JIRA, but we should also start a discussion on the dev and user list to collect some more input. The actual change should be simple.
@Everybody: I created a wiki page for the 1.2 release [1] and added all features discussed in this thread so far. Please have a look at the page and update it if you know the JIRAs and/or state of the features. Cheers, Fabian [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/1.2+Release 2016-10-28 15:28 GMT+02:00 Kostas Kloudas <k.klou...@data-artisans.com>: > Hello, > > As Aljoshca said, the TriggerDSL depends on another PR, before it can be > merged. > In addition, this will change also the whole structure of how we test > window/trigger > related functionality, so some refactoring will be required. > > Kostas > > > On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > @Till: For the TriggerDSL we have to merge my open PR [1] for refactoring > > the WindowOperator/Trigger tests and then refactor the tests of the > > TriggerDSL to use the new test facilities introduced there. Plus then > maybe > > some fixups. > > > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 at 11:17 Jark Wu <wuchong...@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 to the schedule > >> > >> I hope to add > >> > >> 1) Table API: User defined table function (FLINK-4469 < > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469>) > >> 2) Table API: Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table (FLINK-4704 < > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4704>) > >> > >> The 1) has been discussed for a long time and a pull request has been on > >> github. The 2) would be a large change, but I hope it could be included > in > >> 1.2 release, otherwise it will be more difficult to fix it. > >> > >> - Jark Wu > >> > >>> 在 2016年10月26日，下午8:09，Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道： > >>> > >>> +1 for the features to include. > >>> > >>> What is the state of the Trigger DSL? How much is left to be done > before > >>> merging? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Till > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 the schedule proposed so far. > >>>> > >>>> Do we also want to get in the "Trigger DSL" that we've had brewing > for a > >>>> while now? > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:17 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I think this sounds very reasonable, +1 to the schedule. > >>>>> > >>>>> I would definitely add > >>>>> - FLIP-10 (unify checkpoints and savepoints) > >>>>> - FLIP-7 (metrics in web UI) > >>>>> - FLIP-12 (async request operators) > >>>>> > >>>>> Those should be all safe bets, as they are basically done. > >>>>> > >>>>> Let's see what else is in shape until the feature freeze day. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi everybody, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Flink 1.1.0 was released in August and I think it is time to kick > off > >> a > >>>>>> discussion about the schedule and scope of Flink 1.2.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> == Scope > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We started to collect features for Flink 1.2.0 in the Flink Release > >>>> wiki > >>>>>> page [1]. > >>>>>> I copy the feature list for convenience: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3755>) (Design Doc > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1OS1z3xEBOrYD4wSu- > >>>>>> LuBCyPUWyFd9l3T9WyssQ63w/edit#heading=h.2suhu1fjxmp4> > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>> - Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLIP-8 > >>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > >>>>>> 8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State> > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>> - Backwards compatible savepoints (FLINK-4797 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4797>) > >>>>>> - > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos (FLINK-1984 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984>) (Design Doc > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQ > >>>>>> xf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit#heading=h.33uxp8abvuf0> > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>> - Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3930>) (Design Doc > >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- > >>>> GQB6uVOyoaXGwtqwqLV8BHDxWiMO2W > >>>>>> nVzBoJ8oPaAs/edit#heading=h.dr22iualfm0h> > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>> - Queryable State (FLINK-3779 > >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3779>) > >>>>>> - Metrics in Webinterface (FLIP-7 > >>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > >>>>>> 7%3A+Expose+metrics+to+WebInterface> > >>>>>> ) > >>>>>> - Kafka 0.10 support (FLINK-4035 > >>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4035>) > >>>>>> - Table API: Group Window Aggregates (FLINK-4691, FLIP-11) > >>>>>> - Table API: Scalar Functions (FLINK-3097) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is a feature missing or something too ambitious? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> == Schedule > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In my opinion we should try to release 1.2.0 before Christmas. That > >>>>> means, > >>>>>> we should have a RC1 by end November / early December and a feature > >>>>> freeze > >>>>>> two weeks earlier in mid of November. Does that sound appropriate or > >>>>> should > >>>>>> we aim for an earlier or later release? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do others think about the scope and schedule? > >>>>>> Please discuss. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Fabian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/ > >>>>>> Flink+Release+and+Feature+Plan > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
