+1 to the schedule I hope to add
1) Table API: User defined table function (FLINK-4469 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469>) 2) Table API: Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table (FLINK-4704 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4704>) The 1) has been discussed for a long time and a pull request has been on github. The 2) would be a large change, but I hope it could be included in 1.2 release, otherwise it will be more difficult to fix it. - Jark Wu > 在 2016年10月26日，下午8:09，Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道： > > +1 for the features to include. > > What is the state of the Trigger DSL? How much is left to be done before > merging? > > Cheers, > Till > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> +1 the schedule proposed so far. >> >> Do we also want to get in the "Trigger DSL" that we've had brewing for a >> while now? >> >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:17 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> I think this sounds very reasonable, +1 to the schedule. >>> >>> I would definitely add >>> - FLIP-10 (unify checkpoints and savepoints) >>> - FLIP-7 (metrics in web UI) >>> - FLIP-12 (async request operators) >>> >>> Those should be all safe bets, as they are basically done. >>> >>> Let's see what else is in shape until the feature freeze day. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> Flink 1.1.0 was released in August and I think it is time to kick off a >>>> discussion about the schedule and scope of Flink 1.2.0. >>>> >>>> == Scope >>>> >>>> We started to collect features for Flink 1.2.0 in the Flink Release >> wiki >>>> page [1]. >>>> I copy the feature list for convenience: >>>> >>>> - Dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3755>) (Design Doc >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1OS1z3xEBOrYD4wSu- >>>> LuBCyPUWyFd9l3T9WyssQ63w/edit#heading=h.2suhu1fjxmp4> >>>> ) >>>> - Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLIP-8 >>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- >>>> 8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State> >>>> ) >>>> - Backwards compatible savepoints (FLINK-4797 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4797>) >>>> - >>>> >>>> Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos (FLINK-1984 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984>) (Design Doc >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQ >>>> xf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit#heading=h.33uxp8abvuf0> >>>> ) >>>> - Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3930>) (Design Doc >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- >> GQB6uVOyoaXGwtqwqLV8BHDxWiMO2W >>>> nVzBoJ8oPaAs/edit#heading=h.dr22iualfm0h> >>>> ) >>>> - Queryable State (FLINK-3779 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3779>) >>>> - Metrics in Webinterface (FLIP-7 >>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- >>>> 7%3A+Expose+metrics+to+WebInterface> >>>> ) >>>> - Kafka 0.10 support (FLINK-4035 >>>> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4035>) >>>> - Table API: Group Window Aggregates (FLINK-4691, FLIP-11) >>>> - Table API: Scalar Functions (FLINK-3097) >>>> >>>> >>>> Is a feature missing or something too ambitious? >>>> >>>> == Schedule >>>> >>>> In my opinion we should try to release 1.2.0 before Christmas. That >>> means, >>>> we should have a RC1 by end November / early December and a feature >>> freeze >>>> two weeks earlier in mid of November. Does that sound appropriate or >>> should >>>> we aim for an earlier or later release? >>>> >>>> What do others think about the scope and schedule? >>>> Please discuss. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Fabian >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/ >>>> Flink+Release+and+Feature+Plan >>>> >>> >>
