Hello, As Aljoshca said, the TriggerDSL depends on another PR, before it can be merged. In addition, this will change also the whole structure of how we test window/trigger related functionality, so some refactoring will be required.
Kostas > On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > > @Till: For the TriggerDSL we have to merge my open PR [1] for refactoring > the WindowOperator/Trigger tests and then refactor the tests of the > TriggerDSL to use the new test facilities introduced there. Plus then maybe > some fixups. > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 at 11:17 Jark Wu <wuchong...@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > >> +1 to the schedule >> >> I hope to add >> >> 1) Table API: User defined table function (FLINK-4469 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469>) >> 2) Table API: Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table (FLINK-4704 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4704>) >> >> The 1) has been discussed for a long time and a pull request has been on >> github. The 2) would be a large change, but I hope it could be included in >> 1.2 release, otherwise it will be more difficult to fix it. >> >> - Jark Wu >> >>> 在 2016年10月26日，下午8:09，Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道： >>> >>> +1 for the features to include. >>> >>> What is the state of the Trigger DSL? How much is left to be done before >>> merging? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 the schedule proposed so far. >>>> >>>> Do we also want to get in the "Trigger DSL" that we've had brewing for a >>>> while now? >>>> >>>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:17 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think this sounds very reasonable, +1 to the schedule. >>>>> >>>>> I would definitely add >>>>> - FLIP-10 (unify checkpoints and savepoints) >>>>> - FLIP-7 (metrics in web UI) >>>>> - FLIP-12 (async request operators) >>>>> >>>>> Those should be all safe bets, as they are basically done. >>>>> >>>>> Let's see what else is in shape until the feature freeze day. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>>> >>>>>> Flink 1.1.0 was released in August and I think it is time to kick off >> a >>>>>> discussion about the schedule and scope of Flink 1.2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> == Scope >>>>>> >>>>>> We started to collect features for Flink 1.2.0 in the Flink Release >>>> wiki >>>>>> page [1]. >>>>>> I copy the feature list for convenience: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3755>) (Design Doc >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1OS1z3xEBOrYD4wSu- >>>>>> LuBCyPUWyFd9l3T9WyssQ63w/edit#heading=h.2suhu1fjxmp4> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> - Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLIP-8 >>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- >>>>>> 8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> - Backwards compatible savepoints (FLINK-4797 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4797>) >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos (FLINK-1984 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984>) (Design Doc >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQ >>>>>> xf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit#heading=h.33uxp8abvuf0> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> - Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3930>) (Design Doc >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- >>>> GQB6uVOyoaXGwtqwqLV8BHDxWiMO2W >>>>>> nVzBoJ8oPaAs/edit#heading=h.dr22iualfm0h> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> - Queryable State (FLINK-3779 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3779>) >>>>>> - Metrics in Webinterface (FLIP-7 >>>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- >>>>>> 7%3A+Expose+metrics+to+WebInterface> >>>>>> ) >>>>>> - Kafka 0.10 support (FLINK-4035 >>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4035>) >>>>>> - Table API: Group Window Aggregates (FLINK-4691, FLIP-11) >>>>>> - Table API: Scalar Functions (FLINK-3097) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is a feature missing or something too ambitious? >>>>>> >>>>>> == Schedule >>>>>> >>>>>> In my opinion we should try to release 1.2.0 before Christmas. That >>>>> means, >>>>>> we should have a RC1 by end November / early December and a feature >>>>> freeze >>>>>> two weeks earlier in mid of November. Does that sound appropriate or >>>>> should >>>>>> we aim for an earlier or later release? >>>>>> >>>>>> What do others think about the scope and schedule? >>>>>> Please discuss. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Fabian >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/ >>>>>> Flink+Release+and+Feature+Plan >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
