@Till: For the TriggerDSL we have to merge my open PR [1] for refactoring the WindowOperator/Trigger tests and then refactor the tests of the TriggerDSL to use the new test facilities introduced there. Plus then maybe some fixups.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 at 11:17 Jark Wu <wuchong...@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > +1 to the schedule > > I hope to add > > 1) Table API: User defined table function (FLINK-4469 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469>) > 2) Table API: Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table (FLINK-4704 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4704>) > > The 1) has been discussed for a long time and a pull request has been on > github. The 2) would be a large change, but I hope it could be included in > 1.2 release, otherwise it will be more difficult to fix it. > > - Jark Wu > > > 在 2016年10月26日，下午8:09，Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 写道： > > > > +1 for the features to include. > > > > What is the state of the Trigger DSL? How much is left to be done before > > merging? > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 the schedule proposed so far. > >> > >> Do we also want to get in the "Trigger DSL" that we've had brewing for a > >> while now? > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:17 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> I think this sounds very reasonable, +1 to the schedule. > >>> > >>> I would definitely add > >>> - FLIP-10 (unify checkpoints and savepoints) > >>> - FLIP-7 (metrics in web UI) > >>> - FLIP-12 (async request operators) > >>> > >>> Those should be all safe bets, as they are basically done. > >>> > >>> Let's see what else is in shape until the feature freeze day. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi everybody, > >>>> > >>>> Flink 1.1.0 was released in August and I think it is time to kick off > a > >>>> discussion about the schedule and scope of Flink 1.2.0. > >>>> > >>>> == Scope > >>>> > >>>> We started to collect features for Flink 1.2.0 in the Flink Release > >> wiki > >>>> page [1]. > >>>> I copy the feature list for convenience: > >>>> > >>>> - Dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3755>) (Design Doc > >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1OS1z3xEBOrYD4wSu- > >>>> LuBCyPUWyFd9l3T9WyssQ63w/edit#heading=h.2suhu1fjxmp4> > >>>> ) > >>>> - Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLIP-8 > >>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > >>>> 8%3A+Rescalable+Non-Partitioned+State> > >>>> ) > >>>> - Backwards compatible savepoints (FLINK-4797 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4797>) > >>>> - > >>>> > >>>> Integrate Flink with Apache Mesos (FLINK-1984 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984>) (Design Doc > >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WItafBmGbjlaBbP8Of5PAFOH9GUJQ > >>>> xf5S4hjEuPchuU/edit#heading=h.33uxp8abvuf0> > >>>> ) > >>>> - Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3930>) (Design Doc > >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1- > >> GQB6uVOyoaXGwtqwqLV8BHDxWiMO2W > >>>> nVzBoJ8oPaAs/edit#heading=h.dr22iualfm0h> > >>>> ) > >>>> - Queryable State (FLINK-3779 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3779>) > >>>> - Metrics in Webinterface (FLIP-7 > >>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- > >>>> 7%3A+Expose+metrics+to+WebInterface> > >>>> ) > >>>> - Kafka 0.10 support (FLINK-4035 > >>>> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4035>) > >>>> - Table API: Group Window Aggregates (FLINK-4691, FLIP-11) > >>>> - Table API: Scalar Functions (FLINK-3097) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Is a feature missing or something too ambitious? > >>>> > >>>> == Schedule > >>>> > >>>> In my opinion we should try to release 1.2.0 before Christmas. That > >>> means, > >>>> we should have a RC1 by end November / early December and a feature > >>> freeze > >>>> two weeks earlier in mid of November. Does that sound appropriate or > >>> should > >>>> we aim for an earlier or later release? > >>>> > >>>> What do others think about the scope and schedule? > >>>> Please discuss. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Fabian > >>>> > >>>> [1] > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/ > >>>> Flink+Release+and+Feature+Plan > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
