+1 for the FLIP and making streaming the common case. Very good proposal :-)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 I like it a lot! > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 at 18:43 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > My take would be to take streaming as the common case and make special > > sections for batch. > > > > We can still have a few streaming-only sections (end to end exactly once) > > and a few batch-only sections (optimizer). > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I very much like this proposal. This is long overdue. Our > > > documentation never "broke up" with the old batch focus. That's where > > > the current structure comes from and why people often don't find what > > > they are looking for. We were trying to treat streaming and batch as > > > equals. We never were "brave" enough to move streaming-only concepts > > > to the top-level. I really like that you are proposing this now (for > > > example for Event time, State Backends etc.). I would love to have > > > this go hand in hand with the 1.2 release. > > > > > > What is your opinion about pages affecting both streaming and batch > > > like "Connectors" or "Failure model"? We could have the landing page > > > cover the general material (e.g. restart strategies) and then have > > > sub-pages for streaming- and batch-specific stuff. Or we treat > > > streaming as the common case and have a sub-section for batch. We > > > probably have to decide this case-by-case, but to me it feels like > > > this was the main problem with the old documentation structure > > > (content is a different story of course ;)). > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > I posted another FLIP - this time about a suggestion to make the > > > > documentation more accessible. > > > > > > > > FLIP-3 - Organization of Documentation > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-3+-+Organization+of+Documentation > > > > > > > > The issue of accessibility of information came up repeatedly from > > users I > > > > talked to, so this is a suggestion how to improve this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > Stephan > > > > > >
