Very nice work Ufuk!
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > I second Aljoscha :-) > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I checked it out and I liked it. :-) >> >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 at 19:40 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Initial PR for the layout: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2387 >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 at 03:15 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 :-) >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > +1, thanks :-) >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > If there are no objections, I would like to work on this in the >> next >> > >> > > days. I would like to only do the restructuring and don't add any >> > new >> > >> > > content (e.g. we would have a few empty pages in the beginning). >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > > > I added to the "Application Development" Docs the Section >> "Types, >> > >> > > > TypeInformation, Serialization". >> > >> > > > I think that is an important enough aspect to warrant separate >> > docs. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Till Rohrmann < >> > trohrm...@apache.org >> > >> > >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> +1 for the FLIP and making streaming the common case. Very good >> > >> > proposal >> > >> > > >> :-) >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> > >> > aljos...@apache.org >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > +1 I like it a lot! >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 at 18:43 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > My take would be to take streaming as the common case and >> > make >> > >> > > special >> > >> > > >> > > sections for batch. >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > We can still have a few streaming-only sections (end to end >> > >> > exactly >> > >> > > >> once) >> > >> > > >> > > and a few batch-only sections (optimizer). >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi < >> u...@apache.org >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > I very much like this proposal. This is long overdue. Our >> > >> > > >> > > > documentation never "broke up" with the old batch focus. >> > >> That's >> > >> > > where >> > >> > > >> > > > the current structure comes from and why people often >> don't >> > >> find >> > >> > > what >> > >> > > >> > > > they are looking for. We were trying to treat streaming >> and >> > >> > batch >> > >> > > as >> > >> > > >> > > > equals. We never were "brave" enough to move >> streaming-only >> > >> > > concepts >> > >> > > >> > > > to the top-level. I really like that you are proposing >> this >> > >> now >> > >> > > (for >> > >> > > >> > > > example for Event time, State Backends etc.). I would >> love >> > to >> > >> > have >> > >> > > >> > > > this go hand in hand with the 1.2 release. >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > What is your opinion about pages affecting both streaming >> > and >> > >> > > batch >> > >> > > >> > > > like "Connectors" or "Failure model"? We could have the >> > >> landing >> > >> > > page >> > >> > > >> > > > cover the general material (e.g. restart strategies) and >> > then >> > >> > have >> > >> > > >> > > > sub-pages for streaming- and batch-specific stuff. Or we >> > treat >> > >> > > >> > > > streaming as the common case and have a sub-section for >> > batch. >> > >> > We >> > >> > > >> > > > probably have to decide this case-by-case, but to me it >> > feels >> > >> > like >> > >> > > >> > > > this was the main problem with the old documentation >> > structure >> > >> > > >> > > > (content is a different story of course ;)). >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Stephan Ewen < >> > >> se...@apache.org >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > > > Hi all! >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > I posted another FLIP - this time about a suggestion to >> > make >> > >> > the >> > >> > > >> > > > > documentation more accessible. >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > FLIP-3 - Organization of Documentation >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP- >> 3+-+Organization+of+Documentation >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > The issue of accessibility of information came up >> > repeatedly >> > >> > > from >> > >> > > >> > > users I >> > >> > > >> > > > > talked to, so this is a suggestion how to improve this. >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > Greetings, >> > >> > > >> > > > > Stephan >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >>
