Sure that is fine with me you are the release manager ;-)

I don't want to say let's not include anything else, just saying that we
need a cutoff point, as we have been postponing this for a while...

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We're waiting for a fix of FLINK-2637 (TypeInfo equals + hashcode).
> Once this is in, we do the first release candidate, OK?
>
> 2015-09-11 14:48 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>:
>
> > Fixes come up on a daily base. I think at some point we need to declare
> > freeze, or this thing will never be released.
> >
> > @Fabian: Since you are release manager, do you want to pick the point to
> > declare freeze (and pick what should be included)?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I would have an important fix too.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2658
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1122
> > >
> > > Or is it too late?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 09/10/2015 06:54 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > > > Since the vote has not been started yet, we might consider including
> > this
> > > > critical fix for the Kafka consumer into 0.10-milestone1:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1117
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I justed opened a PR for FLINK-2632: "Web Client does not respect
> the
> > > >> class loader of submitted jobs"
> > > >>
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1114
> > > >>
> > > >> -Matthias
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 09/10/2015 11:49 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> > > >>> All these bugs reported by users and its just four of them of
> which 2
> > > are
> > > >>> already fixed.
> > > >>> It should be possible to fix them in a day.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2015-09-10 11:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Thank you very much for taking care of the release management!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to block a "preview" release
> on
> > so
> > > >> many
> > > >>>> bug fixes. It feels like 80% of our commits are bugfixes or
> > stability
> > > >>>> improvements anyways, so we would wait infinitely to release the
> > > >> milestone
> > > >>>> if we wait for all of them.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> For example for the class loader issue in the web client issue,
> Max
> > > (who
> > > >>>> initially brought the issue to our attention) also said: "Would be
> > > nice
> > > >> to
> > > >>>> fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the milestone release."
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I would vote for merging Till's
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101
> > > >>>> and then start with the RC0 vote.
> > > >>>> If there are more bug fixes available and the RC0 vote fails
> (which
> > is
> > > >>>> likely ;) ), we can include them as well.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Fabian Hueske <
> fhue...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> I can take the role of the release manager and push the 0.10
> > > milestone
> > > >>>>> release forward.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I added a list of pending fixes for 0.10 to the wiki:
> > > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > >>>>> Please extend the list (or respond to this thread) if you have
> more
> > > >> fixes
> > > >>>>> that should go into the release.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> From the currently open issues only FLINK-2632 (Web Client does
> not
> > > >>>> respect
> > > >>>>> the class loader of submitted jobs) is unassigned.
> > > >>>>> Anybody around to pick this one up?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Cheers, Fabian
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 2015-09-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I forgot to mention that there is also a bug with the
> `StreamFold`
> > > >>>>> operator
> > > >>>>>> which we might consider fixing for the milestone release. I've
> > > opened
> > > >> a
> > > >>>>> PR
> > > >>>>>> for it.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2631
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> This sounds good +1 from me as well :)
> > > >>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont:
> 2015.
> > > >>>>> szept.
> > > >>>>>>> 9.,
> > > >>>>>>> Sze, 10:40):
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release with the TypeInformation issues
> > fixed.
> > > >>>> I'm
> > > >>>>>>>> working on it.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Ewen <
> se...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Great!
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to push one more commit later today.
> > > >>>>>>>>> A fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632
> > would
> > > >>>>>> also
> > > >>>>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>> highly appreciated by some users.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Anyone volunteering as release manager (for creating release
> > > >>>>>> candidates
> > > >>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>> uploading them)?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <
> > > >>>>> ktzou...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Robert Metzger <
> > > >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a "milestone1" release. We have a lot of good
> features
> > > >>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>> master
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> that people can benefit from.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <
> > > >>>>>> m...@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing a milestone release soon to encourage
> > > >>>> people
> > > >>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>> try
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> out the new features.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> There is this bug:
> > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which affects the Web Client's error and results display
> > > >>>> for
> > > >>>>>>> jobs.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to fix it but IMHO it is not critical for
> the
> > > >>>>>>>> milestone
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ufuk Celebi <
> > > >>>> u...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2015, at 12:01, Stephan Ewen <
> > > >>>> se...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some day back we talked about releasing an
> > > >>>>> 0.10.0-milestone1
> > > >>>>>>>>>> release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> master has advanced quite a bit (especially due to
> > > >>>>>>>>> high-availability
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> code).
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cherry picked the important additions to the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-milestone1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch (fixes and Kafka consumer/producer rework).
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about releasing the branch now as an intermediate
> > > >>>>>> version
> > > >>>>>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> people to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> try out while we stabilize the windows and HA code for
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>>> 0.10
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> release?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for cping the important changes. I’ve checked and
> > > >>>>>> there
> > > >>>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing I would add at this point.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anybody else took a look at it? Other than that, I
> > > >>>>> think
> > > >>>>>>> it’s
> > > >>>>>>>>>> good
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to go.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to