We're waiting for a fix of FLINK-2637 (TypeInfo equals + hashcode). Once this is in, we do the first release candidate, OK?
2015-09-11 14:48 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>: > Fixes come up on a daily base. I think at some point we need to declare > freeze, or this thing will never be released. > > @Fabian: Since you are release manager, do you want to pick the point to > declare freeze (and pick what should be included)? > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I would have an important fix too. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2658 > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1122 > > > > Or is it too late? > > > > > > On 09/10/2015 06:54 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > Since the vote has not been started yet, we might consider including > this > > > critical fix for the Kafka consumer into 0.10-milestone1: > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1117 > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I justed opened a PR for FLINK-2632: "Web Client does not respect the > > >> class loader of submitted jobs" > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1114 > > >> > > >> -Matthias > > >> > > >> > > >> On 09/10/2015 11:49 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > > >>> All these bugs reported by users and its just four of them of which 2 > > are > > >>> already fixed. > > >>> It should be possible to fix them in a day. > > >>> > > >>> 2015-09-10 11:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>: > > >>> > > >>>> Thank you very much for taking care of the release management! > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to block a "preview" release on > so > > >> many > > >>>> bug fixes. It feels like 80% of our commits are bugfixes or > stability > > >>>> improvements anyways, so we would wait infinitely to release the > > >> milestone > > >>>> if we wait for all of them. > > >>>> > > >>>> For example for the class loader issue in the web client issue, Max > > (who > > >>>> initially brought the issue to our attention) also said: "Would be > > nice > > >> to > > >>>> fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the milestone release." > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I would vote for merging Till's > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101 > > >>>> and then start with the RC0 vote. > > >>>> If there are more bug fixes available and the RC0 vote fails (which > is > > >>>> likely ;) ), we can include them as well. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I can take the role of the release manager and push the 0.10 > > milestone > > >>>>> release forward. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I added a list of pending fixes for 0.10 to the wiki: > > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release > > >>>>> Please extend the list (or respond to this thread) if you have more > > >> fixes > > >>>>> that should go into the release. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> From the currently open issues only FLINK-2632 (Web Client does not > > >>>> respect > > >>>>> the class loader of submitted jobs) is unassigned. > > >>>>> Anybody around to pick this one up? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cheers, Fabian > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2015-09-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I forgot to mention that there is also a bug with the `StreamFold` > > >>>>> operator > > >>>>>> which we might consider fixing for the milestone release. I've > > opened > > >> a > > >>>>> PR > > >>>>>> for it. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2631 > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> This sounds good +1 from me as well :) > > >>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. > > >>>>> szept. > > >>>>>>> 9., > > >>>>>>> Sze, 10:40): > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release with the TypeInformation issues > fixed. > > >>>> I'm > > >>>>>>>> working on it. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Great! > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to push one more commit later today. > > >>>>>>>>> A fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 > would > > >>>>>> also > > >>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>> highly appreciated by some users. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Anyone volunteering as release manager (for creating release > > >>>>>> candidates > > >>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> uploading them)? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Kostas Tzoumas < > > >>>>> ktzou...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Robert Metzger < > > >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a "milestone1" release. We have a lot of good features > > >>>>> in > > >>>>>>>> master > > >>>>>>>>>>> that people can benefit from. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Maximilian Michels < > > >>>>>> m...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing a milestone release soon to encourage > > >>>> people > > >>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>> try > > >>>>>>>>>>>> out the new features. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> There is this bug: > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which affects the Web Client's error and results display > > >>>> for > > >>>>>>> jobs. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the > > >>>>>>>> milestone > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ufuk Celebi < > > >>>> u...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2015, at 12:01, Stephan Ewen < > > >>>> se...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some day back we talked about releasing an > > >>>>> 0.10.0-milestone1 > > >>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> master has advanced quite a bit (especially due to > > >>>>>>>>> high-availability > > >>>>>>>>>>>> code). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cherry picked the important additions to the > > >>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-milestone1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch (fixes and Kafka consumer/producer rework). > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about releasing the branch now as an intermediate > > >>>>>> version > > >>>>>>>> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>> people to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> try out while we stabilize the windows and HA code for > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>> 0.10 > > >>>>>>>>>>> release? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for cping the important changes. I’ve checked and > > >>>>>> there > > >>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing I would add at this point. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anybody else took a look at it? Other than that, I > > >>>>> think > > >>>>>>> it’s > > >>>>>>>>>> good > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to go. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >
