I would have an important fix too.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2658
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1122

Or is it too late?


On 09/10/2015 06:54 PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Since the vote has not been started yet, we might consider including this
> critical fix for the Kafka consumer into 0.10-milestone1:
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1117
> 
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I justed opened a PR for FLINK-2632: "Web Client does not respect the
>> class loader of submitted jobs"
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1114
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>> On 09/10/2015 11:49 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>>> All these bugs reported by users and its just four of them of which 2 are
>>> already fixed.
>>> It should be possible to fix them in a day.
>>>
>>> 2015-09-10 11:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>:
>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for taking care of the release management!
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to block a "preview" release on so
>> many
>>>> bug fixes. It feels like 80% of our commits are bugfixes or stability
>>>> improvements anyways, so we would wait infinitely to release the
>> milestone
>>>> if we wait for all of them.
>>>>
>>>> For example for the class loader issue in the web client issue, Max (who
>>>> initially brought the issue to our attention) also said: "Would be nice
>> to
>>>> fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the milestone release."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would vote for merging Till's
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101
>>>> and then start with the RC0 vote.
>>>> If there are more bug fixes available and the RC0 vote fails (which is
>>>> likely ;) ), we can include them as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can take the role of the release manager and push the 0.10 milestone
>>>>> release forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> I added a list of pending fixes for 0.10 to the wiki:
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
>>>>> Please extend the list (or respond to this thread) if you have more
>> fixes
>>>>> that should go into the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> From the currently open issues only FLINK-2632 (Web Client does not
>>>> respect
>>>>> the class loader of submitted jobs) is unassigned.
>>>>> Anybody around to pick this one up?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-09-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I forgot to mention that there is also a bug with the `StreamFold`
>>>>> operator
>>>>>> which we might consider fixing for the milestone release. I've opened
>> a
>>>>> PR
>>>>>> for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2631
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This sounds good +1 from me as well :)
>>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2015.
>>>>> szept.
>>>>>>> 9.,
>>>>>>> Sze, 10:40):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release with the TypeInformation issues fixed.
>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>> working on it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to push one more commit later today.
>>>>>>>>> A fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 would
>>>>>> also
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> highly appreciated by some users.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyone volunteering as release manager (for creating release
>>>>>> candidates
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> uploading them)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <
>>>>> ktzou...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Robert Metzger <
>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a "milestone1" release. We have a lot of good features
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>> that people can benefit from.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>>>>>> m...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing a milestone release soon to encourage
>>>> people
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>>>> out the new features.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is this bug:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632
>>>>>>>>>>>> which affects the Web Client's error and results display
>>>> for
>>>>>>> jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the
>>>>>>>> milestone
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ufuk Celebi <
>>>> u...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2015, at 12:01, Stephan Ewen <
>>>> se...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some day back we talked about releasing an
>>>>> 0.10.0-milestone1
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master has advanced quite a bit (especially due to
>>>>>>>>> high-availability
>>>>>>>>>>>> code).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cherry picked the important additions to the
>>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-milestone1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch (fixes and Kafka consumer/producer rework).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about releasing the branch now as an intermediate
>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> people to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try out while we stabilize the windows and HA code for
>>>> the
>>>>>>> 0.10
>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for cping the important changes. I’ve checked and
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing I would add at this point.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anybody else took a look at it? Other than that, I
>>>>> think
>>>>>>> it’s
>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>> to go.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to