Fixes come up on a daily base. I think at some point we need to declare freeze, or this thing will never be released.
@Fabian: Since you are release manager, do you want to pick the point to declare freeze (and pick what should be included)? On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > I would have an important fix too. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2658 > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1122 > > Or is it too late? > > > On 09/10/2015 06:54 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > > Since the vote has not been started yet, we might consider including this > > critical fix for the Kafka consumer into 0.10-milestone1: > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1117 > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> I justed opened a PR for FLINK-2632: "Web Client does not respect the > >> class loader of submitted jobs" > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1114 > >> > >> -Matthias > >> > >> > >> On 09/10/2015 11:49 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > >>> All these bugs reported by users and its just four of them of which 2 > are > >>> already fixed. > >>> It should be possible to fix them in a day. > >>> > >>> 2015-09-10 11:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>: > >>> > >>>> Thank you very much for taking care of the release management! > >>>> > >>>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to block a "preview" release on so > >> many > >>>> bug fixes. It feels like 80% of our commits are bugfixes or stability > >>>> improvements anyways, so we would wait infinitely to release the > >> milestone > >>>> if we wait for all of them. > >>>> > >>>> For example for the class loader issue in the web client issue, Max > (who > >>>> initially brought the issue to our attention) also said: "Would be > nice > >> to > >>>> fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the milestone release." > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I would vote for merging Till's > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101 > >>>> and then start with the RC0 vote. > >>>> If there are more bug fixes available and the RC0 vote fails (which is > >>>> likely ;) ), we can include them as well. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I can take the role of the release manager and push the 0.10 > milestone > >>>>> release forward. > >>>>> > >>>>> I added a list of pending fixes for 0.10 to the wiki: > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release > >>>>> Please extend the list (or respond to this thread) if you have more > >> fixes > >>>>> that should go into the release. > >>>>> > >>>>> From the currently open issues only FLINK-2632 (Web Client does not > >>>> respect > >>>>> the class loader of submitted jobs) is unassigned. > >>>>> Anybody around to pick this one up? > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, Fabian > >>>>> > >>>>> 2015-09-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I forgot to mention that there is also a bug with the `StreamFold` > >>>>> operator > >>>>>> which we might consider fixing for the milestone release. I've > opened > >> a > >>>>> PR > >>>>>> for it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2631 > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1101 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> This sounds good +1 from me as well :) > >>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. > >>>>> szept. > >>>>>>> 9., > >>>>>>> Sze, 10:40): > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release with the TypeInformation issues fixed. > >>>> I'm > >>>>>>>> working on it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Great! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to push one more commit later today. > >>>>>>>>> A fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 would > >>>>>> also > >>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>> highly appreciated by some users. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Anyone volunteering as release manager (for creating release > >>>>>> candidates > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> uploading them)? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Kostas Tzoumas < > >>>>> ktzou...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for a milestone release > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Robert Metzger < > >>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 for a "milestone1" release. We have a lot of good features > >>>>> in > >>>>>>>> master > >>>>>>>>>>> that people can benefit from. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Maximilian Michels < > >>>>>> m...@apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing a milestone release soon to encourage > >>>> people > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> try > >>>>>>>>>>>> out the new features. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> There is this bug: > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 > >>>>>>>>>>>> which affects the Web Client's error and results display > >>>> for > >>>>>>> jobs. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the > >>>>>>>> milestone > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ufuk Celebi < > >>>> u...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08 Sep 2015, at 12:01, Stephan Ewen < > >>>> se...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some day back we talked about releasing an > >>>>> 0.10.0-milestone1 > >>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>> The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> master has advanced quite a bit (especially due to > >>>>>>>>> high-availability > >>>>>>>>>>>> code). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cherry picked the important additions to the > >>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-milestone1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch (fixes and Kafka consumer/producer rework). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about releasing the branch now as an intermediate > >>>>>> version > >>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>> people to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> try out while we stabilize the windows and HA code for > >>>> the > >>>>>>> 0.10 > >>>>>>>>>>> release? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for cping the important changes. I’ve checked and > >>>>>> there > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing I would add at this point. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anybody else took a look at it? Other than that, I > >>>>> think > >>>>>>> it’s > >>>>>>>>>> good > >>>>>>>>>>>> to go. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
