Hi, > Why did you decide to call it SAX2 and not just SAX or SAX 2.0?
That's the product name eg http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596002374.do > And should we also be putting version numbers on all of the other > dependencies? We could, and it is useful, but AFAIK not required. > Also, I fixed “produce” and one other typo so pull before you make any > further changes. Thanks. > Of all the legal notices that come with Saxon, I’m pretty sure Ant is not > included in > the jar we are using but Resolver and Xerces are, but you can double check > that if you want. I didn’t check the others. I'll check and add what I think is required to NOTICE, should be able to do that tonight. Justin
