From [1], I would interpret the following: For the purposes of being a dependency to an Apache product, which licenses are considered to be similar in terms to the Apache License 2.0?Works under the following licenses may be included within Apache products:
* Apache License 2.0 <http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> <many licenses skipped> * License for CERN packages in COLT <http://acs.lbl.gov/software/colt/license.html> but note that this applies only to CERN packages in COLT and not others to mean that we need approval to use the CERN sort algorithm bundled in Saxon. I agree with Justin that Legal really should approve, but technically they haven’t. But if approved, then yes, we need to change NOTICE as Justin said. There is a complex set of NOTICES that come with Saxon. I think Justin and I agree that some don’t need to be in our NOTICE. [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html On 1/4/15, 5:54 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >That is awesome! > >So, just change NOTICE and we're done with this? > >EdB > > > >On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> If you and Alex keep on disagreeing >> >> I actually don't think there's any disagreement here. >> >> Justin > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
