While you guys are busy (and please don't let me distract you), a quick theoretical question:
Why don't we just throw in each and every license we might possibly need, and call it a day? What's wrong with one or two too many licenses? EdB On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 1/5/15, 1:05 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >>JAMESCLARK notice - used in saxon9-xpath.jar >> >>Any differing opinions? > > I did get a slightly different result. I agree with all of the other > findings, but I think I see James Clark in saxon9.jar. You tend to be > better at digging through this stuff, so I’ll just explain my technique > which could be flawed. > > I went and grabbed the sources for SaxonB from [1] > Then I used grep to look for words that would indicate usage in the source > for a particular notice file. > Then I ran jar -tf saxon9.jar to get the list of classes in the jar we use. > If I saw that grep showed usage in a source file, and that source file was > listed as a class in saxon9.jar, then I would consider that ‘usage’. > > This technique shows that James Clark is the author of: > net/sf/saxon/java/JDK14RegexTranslator.java > net/sf/saxon/java/JDK15RegexTranslator.java > > > > And those classes are in saxon9.jar, but I haven’t studied the > JAMESCLARK.txt notice or other supporting documents in detail to know if > that notice only applies to a particular work of his. > > -Alex > > [1] > http://sourceforge.net/projects/saxon/files/Saxon-B/9.1.0.8/saxonb9-1-0-8so > urce.zip/download > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
