Hi, > Are you saying this change, which you advocated, was wrong? Was there a > reversal of the thread somewhere?
Neither - see my other email and the original thread on legal. > Can you point me to a podling or two that got rejected for doing this for AL > 3rd party content? Off top of head look at Drill + Flink. There been other cases but usually it's fix this before you next release, having extra stuff in LICENSE is not as big an issue as missing stuff from LICENSE as the minimum legal requirement have still been met. Thanks, Justin
