Again, I am not an authority, but I believe permissive licenses like Apache and MIT allow for re-licensing. The question is, which work do you want to include?
-Alex On 9/9/14 3:10 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >Okay, time to reset this conversation. I was digging deeper and found a >comment on the class in svgweb that mentions that this code actually came >from the Degrafa library [1] > >Degrafa is released under MIT license [2]. > >I guess this means that we still have to add this under the subcomponents >area in the LICENSE file, right? > >Thanks, >Om > >[1] >https://code.google.com/p/degrafa/source/browse/branches/Origin/Degrafa/co >m/degrafa/geometry/utilities/ArcUtils.as?r=187 >[2] https://code.google.com/p/degrafa/ > >On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please do not do this. There have been several incubator projects who's >> release candidates have been rejected for including Apache licensed >> software in LICENSE. If something is Apache licensed 3rd party or not >>there >> is no need to add it to LICENSE. [1] >> >> > Yes. And we should make a note that it is third-party in the LICENSE >> file >> > by adding: >> > >> > -------- >> > APACHE FLEX SUBCOMPONENTS: >> > >> > The Apache Flex Installer includes a number of subcomponents with >> > separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source >> > code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and >> > conditions of the following licenses. >> > >> > The Elliptical Arc algorithm is available under Apache License 2.0. >>For >> > details >> > see <path to file> >> > >> > -------- >> >> Justin >> >> 1.http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
