On 9/9/14 2:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >Please do not do this. There have been several incubator projects who's >release candidates have been rejected for including Apache licensed >software in LICENSE. If something is Apache licensed 3rd party or not >there is no need to add it to LICENSE. [1] Interesting. Do you remember this thread [2]? It resulted in us adding the following to the Installer LICENSE. ------- APACHE FLEX SUBCOMPONENTS: The Apache Flex Installer includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and conditions of the following licenses. The Open-Sans font is available under Apache License 2.0. For details see common/src/assets/fonts/open-sans/ The NativeApplicationUpdater is available under Apache License 2.0. For details see installer/src/com/riaspace/ ------- Are you saying this change, which you advocated, was wrong? Was there a reversal of the thread somewhere? Can you point me to a podling or two that got rejected for doing this for AL 3rd party content? > >1.http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201406.mbox/%3cC aogo0vandukwwdgzmf5farutkcqbzdbboyup+twdcve+35x...@mail.gmail.com%3e
