As a former degrafa contributor, just a quick note to point out that the svg path arc implementation is described by w3 here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/implnote.html#ArcImplementationNotes this is what the code from degrafa was doing and whatever variation of it was found in svgweb. Greg Dove Dove Software Development Ltd http://greg-dove.com On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 9/9/14 5:38 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >>> or list where the code came form in another file, > >> Our last instructions are to do so in the LICENSE file. > > > >For a binary file whose license wasn't immediately clear. Here we have a > >source file with an Apache header, this is clearly covered by [1]. > Maybe I wasn't clear enough: by "last instructions" I meant this thread > [2] in which sebb approved a patch that would modify the paragraph you > link to in [1] to read: > > "Assuming once again that that the bundled dependency itself contains no > bundled subcomponents under other licenses and thus the ALv2 applies > uniformly to all files, there is no need to add another copy of the ALv2 > license, but if the dependency is third-party, the LICENSE file should > include: > > 'Includes Foo V1.2 under the Apache License 2.0'" > > > It does not mention binaries so I think it applies to source as well. I > guess I could see if I have karma to go apply the patch now, but you're > saying there's another thread on documenting 3rd party works somewhere > else in the ASF? Is on another list besides general@ or is it buried in > some podling's vote thread? > > Thanks, > -Alex > > > >1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > [2] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201406.mbox/%3cC > aogo0vandukwwdgzmf5farutkcqbzdbboyup+twdcve+35x...@mail.gmail.com%3e > >
