On 3/15/14 11:05 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> Yeah, I didn't see you add it, but by luck I just happened to notice >>there >> is at least one copy in there. That means work for the build script as >>it >> will have to download SWFObject and copy it into all of those places. > >No need as that directory is not part of the source or release artifact >but I will remove the Apache license as that is incorrect. IMO, swfobject must be removed from the repo. I don't think the folks who signed the SGA had the right to donate SWFObject. > >BTW the Flex SDK has the same issue or rather I though it did sems the >file has been removed from teh repo but was also added to .gitignore. I >must if had an old copy lying about. We removed it for the reason stated above. Because it gets downloaded in the build it had to go in .gitignore. I think you'll have to do the same for the flexunit repo. > >> Are these for optional features? >Not that I'm aware of but I'm not that familiar with the internals of >flexunit. OK, can you list out the files and their incompatible licenses so the Labriola or some other FlexUnit expert can tell us if they are for required features? Thanks, -Alex
