Oh, I missed this one yesterday apparently.
Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to introduce a
new first level helper command which would set a boolean value to apply this
escapes, does it make sense ?
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:26:36 +0400
> From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
>
>
> > Btw, does it means the idea-fdb-fix will contains only the StringUtil /
> > ExpressionCache fixes now ?
> Yes
> > I didn't integrated this fix because you told me it is more an IDE thing
> > and I didn't look at it closely, what impact it would be to integrate it
> > and using FDB standalone ?
> The fix escapes special symbols and surrounds result with
> "IDEA-ESCAPE-START" and "IDEA-ESCAPE-END", so that's not something that
> can go to Apache repo.
> The problem that is solves is to distinguish line break in fdb output
> that means 'fdb message finished' from line breaks that are inside
> printed string var value.
> For example (using Java string syntax) "myString = a \n b" (with real
> line break char) becomes "myString = IDEA-ESCAPE-STARTa \\n
> bIDEA-ESCAPE-END" (without real line break char).
> This is not a problem for command line fdb usage, but may be a big
> problem for IDE. May be you can suggest a solution that works both for
> IDE and command line.
