Committed and built jar attached for testing purpose
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34049
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:38:31 +0400
> From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
>
> As I said I think there's no need in XXX-START/XXX-END markers at all.
> IDE that passed -ide param treats all var values as escaped.
>
> On 17.01.2014 14:59, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> > Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE- :-) and maybe keep -ide
> > instead of -escaped-var-values if we need something else applied for IDEs
> > later.
> >
> > Any other thoughts ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:44:12 +0400
> >> From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
> >>
> >> Yes, something like fdb -escaped-var-values.
> >> If enabled then there's no need in start/end markers (like
> >> "IDEA-ESCAPE-START"/"IDEA-ESCAPE-END"), as var values are always
> >> escaped. Implementation of escape() method is there in my StringUtil class.
> >>
> >> On 17.01.2014 14:33, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> >>> hum, what do you mean, something like "fdb -ide" ?
> >>>
> >>> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:29:32 +0400
> >>>> From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
> >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to
> >>>>> introduce a new first level helper command which would set a boolean
> >>>>> value to apply this escapes, does it make sense ?
> >>>> Or may be just add undocumented command line option.
> >>>
> >
>
