Hi, > And here I was thinking that suggestions would come in the form of what people > would like to see on the actual site, not whether the site could actually > exist. I don't think anyone thinks the site shouldn't exist, and there's several people that think it's a good idea and are willing to help out.
> And part of that community was the old flexexamples.com website: it was not > owned directly > by Adobe, it is owned by Peter Dehaan, who happened to work for Adobe If he worked for Adobe as a full time person then they probably do own it. That may be an issue if you intend to reuse some of the examples on your site (and if the content is ever donated to Apache), although I do note they were CC licensed. > It is a "fan site", and will constitutes fair use in my opinion, end of story. I think your good intentions are clear and are certainly not the issue here. Just be aware that the ASF view is that: ... "and please realize that the use of ASF trademarks in your domain names is generally not "nominative fair use." "[1] > I'll release a private beta when the time comes, and all three of us -- > me, the apache suits and the flex team -- can revisit the whole issue at that > time. That sounds like a good approach, but I'd suggest you have a backup domain name just in case trademarks decide it can't be used. Thanks, Justin 1.http://apache.org/foundation/marks/#domains
