Do you know why Scale doesn't display NaN? I didn't see any code setting _playheadTime to zero, but I certainly could have missed it.
I think you're saying that since _playheadTime is continuously increasing even when waiting for startDelay, that there is no need to factor startDelay into the getter. Is that correct? -Alex On 12/16/13 2:39 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> In the bug, the user seems to want to see time increasing while time < >> startDelay. >More about having it consistent between the two types of animation, >notice that both has a startDelay of 200 but return different values in >that time interval. > >> Is that what you think should happen too, or should it be 0 or >> NaN? >IMO 0 initially as it 0 after it finished not NaN. > >> If it should just increase, I don't understand the point of >> including startDelay. >It should include the start delay period and increase IMO just as Scale >does. > >Thanks, >Justin
