Hi, > In the bug, the user seems to want to see time increasing while time < > startDelay. More about having it consistent between the two types of animation, notice that both has a startDelay of 200 but return different values in that time interval.
> Is that what you think should happen too, or should it be 0 or > NaN? IMO 0 initially as it 0 after it finished not NaN. > If it should just increase, I don't understand the point of > including startDelay. It should include the start delay period and increase IMO just as Scale does. Thanks, Justin
