OK, I've pushed the changes for this. The rc for the pixel bender packages is at [1]
I'll call for a vote if jenkins starts working and nothing obvious breaks. It's almost quitting time for tonight so if there is fallout, I'll have to deal with it tomorrow. -Alex [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/pixelbender/rc1/ On 12/12/13 11:12 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: >>Someone would run this script once, then commit the zip file to >>flex-utilities/pixel_bender, that could be used by other scripts... >>I think with this plan we won't be touching flex-utilities. We can't >>check a zip in there. The packages will go on dist after a vote. > >Sorry, I meant "commit to dist". > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 20:02 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : Re: PixelBender and Builds.a.o > > > >On 12/12/13 10:32 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> >wrote: > >>>Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and >>>simply add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be >>>simpler and gives us the option of >reverting back to a single package >>>if we find that we can someday. >> >>That sound like a good idea. >>I think the build script should be a concatenation of the current >>pixel_bender_compile (that produces the pbj in place) and "archive-pbj" >>target in the main build.xml, that zips the sdk pbjs, in ./out/pb.tar. >I think more adjustments are needed. I think we have to create a true >source and binary package, package up NOTICE and LICENSE files, etc. > >>Someone would run this script once, then commit the zip file to >>flex-utilities/pixel_bender, that could be used by other scripts... >I think with this plan we won't be touching flex-utilities. We can't >check a zip in there. The packages will go on dist after a vote. > >Or am I missing something? > >-Alex >
