>Someone would run this script once, then commit the zip file to >flex-utilities/pixel_bender, that could be used by other scripts... >I think with this plan we won't be touching flex-utilities. We can't check a >zip in there. The packages will go on dist after a vote.
Sorry, I meant "commit to dist". Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 20:02 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: PixelBender and Builds.a.o On 12/12/13 10:32 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: >>Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and >>simply add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be >>simpler and gives us the option of >reverting back to a single package >>if we find that we can someday. > >That sound like a good idea. >I think the build script should be a concatenation of the current >pixel_bender_compile (that produces the pbj in place) and "archive-pbj" >target in the main build.xml, that zips the sdk pbjs, in ./out/pb.tar. I think more adjustments are needed. I think we have to create a true source and binary package, package up NOTICE and LICENSE files, etc. >Someone would run this script once, then commit the zip file to >flex-utilities/pixel_bender, that could be used by other scripts... I think with this plan we won't be touching flex-utilities. We can't check a zip in there. The packages will go on dist after a vote. Or am I missing something? -Alex
