On 12/12/13 10:32 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
>>Another possibility is that we leave the PBK's where they are and simply >>add new build targets to flex-sdk build script. That might be simpler >>and gives us the option of >reverting back to a single package if we >>find that we can someday. > >That sound like a good idea. >I think the build script should be a concatenation of the current >pixel_bender_compile (that produces the pbj in place) >and "archive-pbj" target in the main build.xml, that zips the sdk pbjs, >in ./out/pb.tar. I think more adjustments are needed. I think we have to create a true source and binary package, package up NOTICE and LICENSE files, etc. >Someone would run this script once, then commit the zip file to >flex-utilities/pixel_bender, that could be used by other scripts... I think with this plan we won't be touching flex-utilities. We can't check a zip in there. The packages will go on dist after a vote. Or am I missing something? -Alex
