I guess you should miss something like that:
<properties>
...
<flashPlayer.command>[path to the flashplayer]</flashPlayer.command>
...
</properties>
<plugin>
<groupId>net.flexmojos.oss</groupId>
<artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId>
...
<configuration>
...
<flashPlayerCommand>${flashPlayer.command}</flashPlayerCommand>
...
</configuration>
...
</plugin>
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 15 septembre 2013 15:06
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
getAdvancedTelemetry()
I started getting this error out of the blue. Any ideas what might be
causing it?
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
net.flexmojos.oss:flexmojos-maven-plugin:6.0.1:test-run (default-test-run)
on project slots_client_common:* Invalid state: the flashplayer is closed,
but the sockets still running... -> *[Help 1]
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute
goal net.flexmojos.oss:flexmojos-maven-plugin:6.0.1:test-run
(default-test-run) on project slots_client_common: Invalid state: the
flashplayer is closed, but the sockets still running...
at
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:2
17)
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I forgot to mention that from what I can see everything looks correct,
> so I'm guessing there is some small typo or something.
> brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would try doing a text comparison between your pom and the one
> > posted here, and see if it catches anything.
> > I'd do it for you, but outside my git commitsI don't have a good
> > text comparison tool.
> >
> > http://stackoverflow.com/a/18713810/787202
> > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, mscharp <michael.sch...@fmr.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks Avi, here is what I have defined for the dependencies in my
> build tag, are there more/different dependencies I need to set?
> >>
> >> <dependencies>
> >> <dependency>
> >> <groupId>${flex.groupId}</groupId>
> >> <artifactId>compiler</artifactId>
> >> <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >> <type>pom</type>
> >> </dependency>
> >> </dependencies>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> From: Avi Kessner [via Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
> ml-node+s2333347n29608...@n4.nabble.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:32 AM
> >> To: Scharp, Michael
> >> Subject: RE: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >>
> >> You need to overide /set the dependencies in the plugin inside the
build
> >> tags
> >> On 13 Sep 2013 08:35, "mscharp" <[hidden
> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=0>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of
> FM.
> >>> I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first
> things I'm
> >>> seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against
> >>> 4.10.0.20130801?
> >>>
> >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is
> missing,
> >>> no dependency information available
> >>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.
> CENSORED
> >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom
> >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> >>> missing, no dependency information available
> >>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.
> CENSORED
> >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom
> >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201
is
> >>> missing, no dependency information available
> >>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.
> CENSORED
> >>>
> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom
> >>> [WARNING] The POM for
> com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> >>> missing, no dependency information available
> >>> Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
> >>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom
> >>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
> >>> missing, no dependency information available
> >>> Downloading:
> >>>
>
https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/comp
iler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom
> >>> [WARNING] The POM for
> com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201
> >>> is missing, no dependency information available
> >>>
> >>> I can post poms if it helps.
> >>>
> >>> On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I
> >>> have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help
> them
> >>> if needed.
> >>>
> >>> Michael
> >>>
> >>> From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=1>
> [via Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
> >>> [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29608&i=2>]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM
> >>> To: Scharp, Michael
> >>> Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >>>
> >>> I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-)
> >>>
> >>> Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think
> >>> that would be a good idea.
> >>> If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be
> >>> possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if
> you are
> >>> talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest
> not
> >>> to try that.
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________________
> >>> Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden
> >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=0>]
> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24
> >>> An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=1>
> >>> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >>>
> >>> If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you
> expect
> >>> that to cause conflicts?
> >>> On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden
> >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=2>" <[hidden
> >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=3>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized
> FDK you
> >>> > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of
> >>> Apache
> >>> > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled
> agains,
> >>> if
> >>> > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency.
> >>> > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like.
> >>> >
> >>> > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the
> Flex
> >>> > RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you
> >>> > visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a
> SWZ
> >>> was
> >>> > loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as
> an
> >>> > application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to
> >>> download
> >>> > it again.
> >>> >
> >>> > The reason for you having to explicitly list every dependency that
> Needs
> >>> a
> >>> > non-Default scope, is mavens inability to overload scopes. So the
> >>> framworks
> >>> > master pom has normal dependencies to it's libs and if you simply
> >>> reference
> >>> > that, you wouldn't utilize the shared-lib concept of RSLs but use
> normal
> >>> > SWCs for compilation, resulting in a way bigger Output file. So if
> you
> >>> want
> >>> > to migrate your Project to Apache Flex you have to replace every
> Caching
> >>> > scope with "rsl".
> >>> >
> >>> > Chris
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > ________________________________________
> >>> > Von: mscharp [[hidden
> >>> email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=4>]
> >>> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:03
> >>> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=5>
> >>> > Betreff: RE: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I
> can't
> >>> > say enough "Thank Yous" for taking over the project.
> >>> >
> >>> > So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version
> of
> >>> > the FDK you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has
> anyone
> >>> > tried using FM 6.0.1 with the 4.10 FDK? My only question with it
> having
> >>> to
> >>> > do with the getAdvancedTelemetry() function that I had to add to the
> FM
> >>> > source code.
> >>> >
> >>> > As far as the RSLs, I read in the release notes that they aren't
> signed,
> >>> > and that it only make sense to use RSLs if you are serving multiple
> flex
> >>> > applications from the same domain... which we are. So, previously
> in our
> >>> > pom files we had:
> >>> >
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>framework</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>textLayout</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>charts</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>rpc</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> <artifactId>mx</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>advancedgrids</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>spark</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>sparkskins</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> >
> <scope>caching</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > Currently I'm not listing any of these as dependencies in our new
> poms.
> >>> > I've been following what I've been able to find on the web as far
as
> >>> > standard practices for what needs to be included in the pom files,
> but a
> >>> > lot of them look a bit different than what we currently have in our
> poms.
> >>> > So, I'm not sure if I still need those dependencies listed or not.
> If I
> >>> > do, would the scope be "rsl" instead of "caching" and now look more
> like
> >>> > this?
> >>> >
> >>> > <dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <artifactId>spark_dmv</artifactId>
> >>> >
> >>> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version>
> >>> > <type>swc</type>
> >>> > <scope>rsl</scope>
> >>> > </dependency>
> >>> >
> >>> > Again, thanks everyone for the help.
> >>> >
> >>> > Michael
> >>> >
> >>> > From: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=6>
> [via
> >>> Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
> >>> > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29598&i=7>]
> >>> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:00 AM
> >>> > To: Scharp, Michael
> >>> > Subject: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >>> >
> >>> > Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc",
> "rsl"
> >>> > and "caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads
different
> >>> files
> >>> > from maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the
signed
> >>> rsls
> >>> > have dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for
swz
> >>> > files, which it doesn't find and therefore the build Fails, causing
> the
> >>> > testsuite to fail.
> >>> >
> >>> > Chris
> >>> >
> >>> > ________________________________________
> >>> > Von: Justin Mclean [[hidden
> >>> > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=0>]
> >>> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 02:45
> >>> > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=29584&i=1>
> >>> > Betreff: Re: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry()
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > > This is because we don't have any signed RSLs (SWZ Files).
> >>> > Why do you need signed files? Apache Flex does come with RSLs they
> are
> >>> > just not signed.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Justin
> >>> > ________________________________
> >>> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> >>> > below:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-
10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29584.html
> >>> > To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> > getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<
> >>> > >.
> >>> > NAML<
> >>> >
> >>>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jt
p?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.
namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.vi
ew.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemai
l.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aem
ail.naml
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > View this message in context:
> >>> >
> >>>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-
10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29594.html
> >>> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> >>> below:
> >>>
> >>>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-
10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29598.html
> >>> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> >>> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<
> >>> >.
> >>> NAML<
> >>>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jt
p?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.
namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.vi
ew.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemai
l.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aem
ail.naml
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-
10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29601.html
> >>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> >>
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-
10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29608.html
> >> To unsubscribe from FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry(), click here<
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jt
p?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=29528&code=bWljaGFlbC5zY2hhcnBAZm1yLmNvbXwy
OTUyOHwtMTU2NDIyNDE0NA==
> >.
> >> NAML<
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jt
p?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.
namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.vi
ew.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemai
l.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aem
ail.naml
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
>
http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexMojos-6-Flex-sdk-4-
10-0-20130801-and-getAdvancedTelemetry-tp29528p29611.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
